RWM vs. EMTY
RWM (ProShares Short Russell2000) and EMTY (ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds from ProShares - RWM tracks the Russell 2000 (-100%) while EMTY tracks the Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RWM returned -5.74%/yr vs -2.56%/yr for EMTY. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RWM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for EMTY.
Performance
RWM vs. EMTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWM achieves a -17.02% return, which is significantly lower than EMTY's 0.81% return.
RWM
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- YTD
- -17.02%
- 6M
- -14.47%
- 1Y
- -28.68%
- 3Y*
- -13.46%
- 5Y*
- -5.74%
- 10Y*
- -12.42%
EMTY
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- -1.61%
- 3Y*
- -3.45%
- 5Y*
- -2.56%
- 10Y*
- —
RWM vs. EMTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000 | -17.02% | -9.40% | -5.91% | -10.43% | 18.34% | -17.90% | -31.04% | -19.83% | 11.57% | -4.86% |
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF | 0.81% | -1.76% | -4.13% | 0.27% | 4.32% | -37.39% | -31.92% | -8.65% | 11.16% | -15.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWM and EMTY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2017 | 0.73 |
The correlation between RWM and EMTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWM vs. EMTY — Risk / Return Rank
RWM
EMTY
RWM vs. EMTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RWM | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.00 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.03 | -0.12 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.83 | -0.22 | -1.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWM vs. EMTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWM drawdown since its inception was -95.58%, which is greater than EMTY's maximum drawdown of -77.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWM and EMTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWM | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.58% | -77.62% | -17.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.83% | -13.91% | -13.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.69% | -30.83% | -11.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.69% | -30.83% | -11.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.58% | -74.84% | -20.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.08% | -54.38% | -19.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.55% | 7.50% | +9.05% |
Volatility
RWM vs. EMTY - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) at 5.23%. This indicates that RWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWM | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 5.23% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.25% | 12.80% | +1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.62% | 17.80% | +1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 22.36% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.17% | 25.64% | -2.47% |
RWM vs. EMTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EMTY's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWM vs. EMTY - Dividend Comparison
RWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than EMTY's 3.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF | 3.46% | 3.83% | 6.00% | 4.41% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.82% | 0.62% | 0.03% |
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000 | 4.28% | 3.97% | 6.03% | 4.78% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.55% | 0.87% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWM and EMTY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RWM has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to EMTY (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWM dropped -95.58% vs EMTY's -77.62%.
On 5-year performance, EMTY leads with -2.56% vs -5.74% for RWM. On fees, EMTY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, EMTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMTY has performed better with a -2.56% return vs -5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMTY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RWM.
RWM has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 3.46% for EMTY.
RWM tracks Russell 2000 (-100%), while EMTY tracks Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%). Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RWM and 0.66% for EMTY.
EMTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWM and EMTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer