PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWM vs. BITO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RWM vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RWM vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RWM
ProShares Short Russell2000
-0.52%-9.40%-5.91%-10.43%18.34%-0.14%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-23.25%-11.19%104.45%137.33%-63.91%-31.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWM achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -23.25% return.


RWM

1D
-3.51%
1M
5.06%
YTD
-0.52%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
-19.15%
3Y*
-8.15%
5Y*
-2.92%
10Y*
-11.01%

BITO

1D
1.75%
1M
2.92%
YTD
-23.25%
6M
-41.96%
1Y
-21.48%
3Y*
24.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RWM vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RWM and BITO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

RWM vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWM
RWM Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
RWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWM Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
RWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWM Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWM vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWMBITODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.83

-0.48

-0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.09

-0.43

-0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.95

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

-0.46

-0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.74

-0.97

+0.23

RWM vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWM Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWM and BITO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWMBITODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.83

-0.48

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

-0.08

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between RWM and BITO is -0.45. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

RWM vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

RWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than BITO's 84.71% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWM
ProShares Short Russell2000
3.57%3.97%6.03%4.78%0.39%0.00%0.20%1.55%0.87%0.07%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
84.71%78.29%61.59%15.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RWM vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWM drawdown since its inception was -95.12%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWM and BITO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RWMBITODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.12%

-77.86%

-17.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.53%

-50.05%

+15.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.70%

-47.07%

-47.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.85%

-36.56%

-37.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.23%

23.55%

+1.68%

Volatility

RWM vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) is 7.47%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 12.89%. This indicates that RWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RWMBITODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

12.89%

-5.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.43%

36.69%

-22.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.18%

45.35%

-22.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.58%

55.79%

-33.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.07%

55.79%

-32.72%