PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWLC vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWLC vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF (RWLC) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWLC achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 50.16% return.


RWLC

1D
-1.37%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
10.23%
6M
11.93%
1Y
20.33%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
10Y*

DBO

1D
-1.13%
1M
-18.58%
YTD
50.16%
6M
47.74%
1Y
36.30%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
9.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWLC vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RWLC
Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF
10.23%20.23%28.58%14.40%-12.40%1.69%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
50.16%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between RWLC and DBO is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021

0.09

The correlation between RWLC and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWLC vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWLC
RWLC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RWLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWLC Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
RWLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWLC vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF (RWLC) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RWLCDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.19

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

1.58

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.94

4.29

+3.64

RWLC vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWLC and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWLC vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWLC drawdown since its inception was -21.00%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWLC and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWLCDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.00%

-90.18%

+69.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-23.03%

+13.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.20%

-28.20%

+12.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-60.48%

+57.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-62.22%

+56.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

8.51%

-5.94%

Volatility

RWLC vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF (RWLC) is 4.85%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that RWLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWLCDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

10.29%

-5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.58%

29.36%

-18.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.43%

34.89%

-20.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

32.54%

-16.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

31.81%

-15.29%

RWLC vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWLC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWLC vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

RWLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.32%, more than DBO's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
2.34%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
RWLC
Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen US Large Cap Equity ETF
13.32%14.69%0.98%1.63%1.39%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWLC and DBO have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to RWLC (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWLC dropped -21.00% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 3-year performance, RWLC leads with 22.87% vs 14.32% for DBO. On fees, RWLC is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, RWLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, RWLC has performed better with a 22.87% return vs 14.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RWLC is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

RWLC has the higher dividend yield at 13.32%, compared with 2.34% for DBO.

RWLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. RWLC tracks S&P 500, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Rayliant and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for RWLC and 0.78% for DBO.

RWLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWLC and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer