RWK vs. VPC
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF (VPC).
RWK and VPC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RWK is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. VPC is a passively managed fund by Virtus Investment Partners that tracks the performance of the Indxx Private Credit Index. It was launched on Feb 7, 2019. Both RWK and VPC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RWK vs. VPC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RWK vs. VPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | 1.75% | 10.27% | 11.94% | 23.76% | -8.19% | 34.31% | 11.06% | 13.79% |
VPC Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF | -11.66% | -6.75% | 10.52% | 22.20% | -11.70% | 34.18% | -9.50% | 9.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWK achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly higher than VPC's -11.66% return.
RWK
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 20.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.66%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
VPC
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- -11.66%
- 6M
- -12.28%
- 1Y
- -16.52%
- 3Y*
- 2.20%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RWK vs. VPC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than VPC's 5.53% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RWK vs. VPC — Risk / Return Rank
RWK
VPC
RWK vs. VPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF (VPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWK | VPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | -1.00 | +1.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | -1.30 | +2.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.83 | +0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | -0.74 | +2.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | -1.75 | +6.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWK | VPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | -1.00 | +1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.16 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.18 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between RWK and VPC is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RWK vs. VPC - Dividend Comparison
RWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than VPC's 17.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.11% | 1.05% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 0.99% | 1.30% | 0.92% |
VPC Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF | 17.77% | 14.33% | 11.26% | 11.71% | 10.74% | 6.31% | 10.06% | 8.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RWK vs. VPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWK drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, which is greater than VPC's maximum drawdown of -53.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWK and VPC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWK | VPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.49% | -53.45% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.17% | -22.76% | +8.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.58% | -24.86% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.69% | -21.75% | +14.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.60% | -7.41% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 9.59% | -5.58% |
Volatility
RWK vs. VPC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF (VPC) at 5.51%. This indicates that RWK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RWK | VPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.93% | 5.51% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | 10.48% | +1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.97% | 16.60% | +5.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.14% | 13.39% | +7.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 20.68% | +2.25% |