PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWK vs. PRDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWK vs. PRDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund (PRDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RWK having a 13.73% return and PRDSX slightly lower at 13.71%. Over the past 10 years, RWK has outperformed PRDSX with an annualized return of 12.83%, while PRDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.61% annualized return.


RWK

1D
1.10%
1M
3.22%
YTD
13.73%
6M
14.17%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*
12.83%

PRDSX

1D
-0.70%
1M
2.59%
YTD
13.71%
6M
14.11%
1Y
29.46%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWK vs. PRDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
13.73%10.27%11.94%23.76%-8.19%34.31%11.06%28.20%-14.65%13.39%
PRDSX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund
13.71%10.10%12.97%21.15%-22.49%11.15%23.85%32.75%-6.91%22.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RWK and PRDSX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2008

0.87

The correlation between RWK and PRDSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWK vs. PRDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWK
RWK Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
RWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWK Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWK Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

PRDSX
PRDSX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PRDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWK vs. PRDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund (PRDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWKPRDSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.82

1.61

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.70

2.32

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.49

+0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.44

9.66

-1.22

RWK vs. PRDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWK Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the PRDSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWK and PRDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWKPRDSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

1.61

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.34

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.54

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.37

+0.11

Drawdowns

RWK vs. PRDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWK drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, roughly equal to the maximum PRDSX drawdown of -58.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWK and PRDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWKPRDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.49%

-58.95%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-12.08%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.58%

-25.84%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.58%

-33.17%

+8.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.20%

-37.61%

-8.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.24%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-14.16%

+6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

3.11%

+0.35%

Volatility

RWK vs. PRDSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) is 4.93%, while T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund (PRDSX) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that RWK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWKPRDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

5.98%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

14.74%

-2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.72%

18.84%

-2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.13%

21.37%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.96%

21.51%

+1.45%

RWK vs. PRDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PRDSX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWK vs. PRDSX - Dividend Comparison

RWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than PRDSX's 5.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRDSX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund
5.58%6.35%7.96%2.43%3.72%13.97%2.91%4.12%4.53%0.10%0.02%1.83%
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
1.12%1.25%1.11%1.05%1.18%0.85%0.96%1.09%1.22%0.99%1.30%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWK and PRDSX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRDSX has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to RWK (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWK dropped -56.49% vs PRDSX's -58.95%.

RWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWK and PRDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer