RWK vs. OSCV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RWK (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF) and OSCV (Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. RWK is passively managed, while OSCV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RWK returned 11.36%/yr vs 6.15%/yr for OSCV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RWK charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for OSCV.

Performance

RWK vs. OSCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWK achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly higher than OSCV's 12.19% return.

RWK

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 3.57%
• YTD: 13.93%
• 6M: 12.02%
• 1Y: 26.41%
• 3Y*: 17.49%
• 5Y*: 11.36%
• 10Y*: 13.12%

OSCV

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 6M: 10.21%
• 1Y: 16.60%
• 3Y*: 11.76%
• 5Y*: 6.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWK vs. OSCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	13.93%	10.27%	11.94%	23.76%	-8.19%	34.31%	11.06%	28.20%	-17.30%
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF	12.19%	1.35%	11.66%	10.14%	-11.41%	27.69%	4.94%	27.51%	-13.57%

Correlation

The correlation between RWK and OSCV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018	0.90

The correlation between RWK and OSCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

RWK vs. OSCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RWK	OSCV
Industrials	22.1%	18.4%
Consumer Cyclical	20.4%	10.7%
Technology	16.1%	2.2%
Financial Services	12.1%	27.7%
Consumer Defensive	10.4%	2.2%
Energy	5.0%	11.3%
Basic Materials	4.9%	6.0%
Healthcare	4.2%	8.6%
Real Estate	2.6%	9.9%
Utilities	1.6%	3.1%
Communication Services	0.7%	-

Return for Risk

RWK vs. OSCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWK

RWK Risk / Return Rank: 48
RWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
RWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
RWK Omega Ratio Rank: 44
RWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
RWK Martin Ratio Rank: 48

OSCV

OSCV Risk / Return Rank: 41
OSCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
OSCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
OSCV Omega Ratio Rank: 34
OSCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
OSCV Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWK vs. OSCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RWK	OSCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	1.25	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	1.93	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.22	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	2.21	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.64	6.42	+1.22

RWK vs. OSCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWK Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the OSCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWK and OSCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RWK vs. OSCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWK drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, which is greater than OSCV's maximum drawdown of -42.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWK and OSCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWK	OSCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.49%	-42.40%	-14.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.14%	-7.55%	-3.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.58%	-22.92%	-1.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.58%	-22.92%	-1.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.79%	-0.04%	-1.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.53%	-7.56%	+0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	2.59%	+0.87%

Volatility

RWK vs. OSCV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) at 2.97%. This indicates that RWK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OSCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWK	OSCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	2.97%	+1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.12%	9.47%	+2.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.82%	13.36%	+3.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.09%	17.22%	+3.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.93%	20.85%	+2.08%

RWK vs. OSCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than OSCV's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWK vs. OSCV - Dividend Comparison

RWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than OSCV's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF	1.07%	1.23%	1.29%	1.55%	1.12%	1.06%	1.11%	1.75%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	1.04%	1.25%	1.11%	1.05%	1.18%	0.85%	0.96%	1.09%	1.22%	0.99%	1.30%	0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWK and OSCV in my portfolio?

RWK and OSCV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RWK or OSCV?

RWK has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to OSCV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWK dropped -56.49% vs OSCV's -42.40%.

Which ETF is better, RWK or OSCV?

On 5-year performance, RWK leads with 11.36% vs 6.15% for OSCV. On fees, RWK is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, OSCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RWK or OSCV?

Over the 5-year period, RWK has performed better with a 11.36% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RWK or OSCV?

RWK is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OSCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RWK or OSCV?

OSCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 1.04% for RWK.

What is the main difference between RWK and OSCV?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RWK and 0.79% for OSCV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.