RWK vs. FESM
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM).
RWK and FESM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RWK is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. FESM is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 20, 2007.
Performance
RWK vs. FESM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RWK vs. FESM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | 1.75% | 10.27% | 11.94% | 9.66% |
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 0.82% | 17.88% | 16.22% | 12.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWK achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly higher than FESM's 0.82% return.
RWK
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 20.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.66%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
FESM
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 4.42%
- 1Y
- 29.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RWK vs. FESM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FESM's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RWK vs. FESM — Risk / Return Rank
RWK
FESM
RWK vs. FESM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWK | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 1.30 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.87 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.24 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 2.19 | -0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | 8.40 | -3.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWK | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.30 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.96 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between RWK and FESM is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RWK vs. FESM - Dividend Comparison
RWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than FESM's 0.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.11% | 1.05% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 0.99% | 1.30% | 0.92% |
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 0.63% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RWK vs. FESM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWK drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, which is greater than FESM's maximum drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWK and FESM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWK | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.49% | -26.93% | -29.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.17% | -13.54% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.69% | -7.23% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.60% | -5.04% | -2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 3.53% | +0.48% |
Volatility
RWK vs. FESM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) is 5.93%, while Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that RWK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FESM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RWK | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.93% | 7.40% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | 14.26% | -2.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.97% | 22.98% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.14% | 21.49% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 21.49% | +1.44% |