RWJ vs. SRVR
RWJ (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWJ is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RWJ returned 8.52%/yr vs -1.65%/yr for SRVR. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RWJ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SRVR.
Performance
RWJ vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWJ achieves a 21.05% return, which is significantly higher than SRVR's 18.64% return.
RWJ
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 21.05%
- 6M
- 17.99%
- 1Y
- 42.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.13%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
SRVR
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- 18.64%
- 6M
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 9.20%
- 3Y*
- 8.49%
- 5Y*
- -1.65%
- 10Y*
- —
RWJ vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 21.05% | 7.75% | 11.81% | 16.21% | -10.97% | 52.82% | 20.83% | 20.29% | -18.11% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 18.64% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 22.31% | 11.99% | 41.98% | -3.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWJ and SRVR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.47 |
The correlation between RWJ and SRVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
RWJ vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RWJ
SRVR
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
RWJ
SRVR
-
Industrials
RWJ
SRVR
Healthcare
RWJ
SRVR
-
Financial Services
RWJ
SRVR
Technology
RWJ
SRVR
Energy
RWJ
SRVR
Consumer Defensive
RWJ
SRVR
-
Basic Materials
RWJ
SRVR
Real Estate
RWJ
SRVR
Communication Services
RWJ
SRVR
Utilities
RWJ
SRVR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWJ vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
RWJ
SRVR
RWJ vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RWJ | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.09 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 0.55 | +3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.43 | 1.17 | +10.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWJ vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWJ drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, which is greater than SRVR's maximum drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWJ and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWJ | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.97% | -40.99% | -14.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -14.78% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.29% | -18.34% | -10.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.29% | -40.99% | +11.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -13.12% | +13.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.22% | -15.25% | +6.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 6.89% | -3.37% |
Volatility
RWJ vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) is 4.67%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that RWJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWJ | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 6.23% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.46% | 13.72% | -1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 17.26% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 19.77% | +3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.14% | 21.46% | +4.68% |
RWJ vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWJ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWJ vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
RWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than SRVR's 2.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.15% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 0.61% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 1.11% | 0.60% | 0.74% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.57% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWJ and SRVR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to RWJ (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWJ dropped -55.97% vs SRVR's -40.99%.
On 5-year performance, RWJ leads with 8.52% vs -1.65% for SRVR. On fees, RWJ is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RWJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RWJ has performed better with a 8.52% return vs -1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RWJ is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SRVR.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.97% for RWJ.
RWJ is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SRVR is REIT. RWJ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index, while SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RWJ and 0.60% for SRVR.
RWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWJ and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer