PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWJ vs. SOXQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWJ vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWJ achieves a 25.74% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 59.97% return.


RWJ

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.40%
6M
17.61%
YTD
25.74%
1Y
43.73%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*
13.60%
ALL TIME*
12.54%

SOXQ

1D
0.15%
1M
-10.31%
6M
41.59%
YTD
59.97%
1Y
105.49%
3Y*
44.02%
5Y*
28.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.35M$5.27M$5.02M
$219.33M$233.61M$278.30M

RWJ vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
25.74%7.75%11.81%16.21%-10.97%1.06%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
59.97%43.11%20.16%66.74%-35.59%25.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RWJ and SOXQ is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021

0.53

The correlation between RWJ and SOXQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RWJ vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RWJ
SOXQ

Consumer Cyclical

25.4%

-

Industrials

15.3%

-

Financial Services

11.6%
0.1%

Healthcare

11.0%

-

Technology

10.3%
99.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Energy

6.5%

-

Basic Materials

4.7%

-

Real Estate

4.1%

-

Communication Services

2.6%

-

Utilities

0.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

RWJ
25.4%
SOXQ

-

Industrials

RWJ
15.3%
SOXQ

-

Financial Services

RWJ
11.6%
SOXQ
0.1%

Healthcare

RWJ
11.0%
SOXQ

-

Technology

RWJ
10.3%
SOXQ
99.9%

Consumer Defensive

RWJ
7.7%
SOXQ

-

Energy

RWJ
6.5%
SOXQ

-

Basic Materials

RWJ
4.7%
SOXQ

-

Real Estate

RWJ
4.1%
SOXQ

-

Communication Services

RWJ
2.6%
SOXQ

-

Utilities

RWJ
0.9%
SOXQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWJ vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RWJ
RWJ Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXQ
SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RWJ vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RWJSOXQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

3.61

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.98

15.05

-3.07

RWJ vs. SOXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the SOXQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWJ and SOXQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWJ vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWJ drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWJ and SOXQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWJSOXQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.97%

-46.01%

-9.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-28.56%

+17.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.29%

-39.36%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.29%

-46.01%

+16.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-22.64%

+20.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-12.92%

+3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

6.83%

-3.47%

Volatility

RWJ vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) is 4.09%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 17.19%. This indicates that RWJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWJSOXQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

17.19%

-13.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.15%

37.70%

-25.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.69%

43.52%

-24.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.49%

38.28%

-14.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.06%

37.93%

-11.87%

RWJ vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWJ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWJ vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison

RWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than SOXQ's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
1.00%1.11%1.15%1.34%1.02%0.61%0.89%1.22%1.44%1.11%0.60%0.74%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.32%0.50%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWJ and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXQ has higher volatility (17.19%) compared to RWJ (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWJ dropped -55.97% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.

On 5-year performance, SOXQ leads with 28.65% vs 10.85% for RWJ. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RWJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 28.65% return vs 10.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWJ.

RWJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.32% for SOXQ.

RWJ is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. RWJ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RWJ and 0.19% for SOXQ.

SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWJ and SOXQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer