RWJ vs. FYT
RWJ (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF) and FYT (First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds - RWJ tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index while FYT tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWJ returned 13.02%/yr vs 9.99%/yr for FYT. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RWJ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for FYT.
Performance
RWJ vs. FYT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RWJ having a 15.88% return and FYT slightly lower at 15.42%. Over the past 10 years, RWJ has outperformed FYT with an annualized return of 13.02%, while FYT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.99% annualized return.
RWJ
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 15.88%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 36.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.73%
- 10Y*
- 13.02%
FYT
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 15.42%
- 6M
- 14.14%
- 1Y
- 34.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
RWJ vs. FYT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 15.88% | 7.75% | 11.81% | 16.21% | -10.97% | 52.82% | 20.83% | 20.29% | -16.95% | 5.30% |
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 15.42% | 4.00% | 3.24% | 22.90% | -14.05% | 29.33% | 9.82% | 25.80% | -14.73% | 7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWJ and FYT is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011 | 0.90 |
The correlation between RWJ and FYT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
RWJ vs. FYT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RWJ
FYT
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
RWJ
FYT
Industrials
RWJ
FYT
Healthcare
RWJ
FYT
Financial Services
RWJ
FYT
Technology
RWJ
FYT
Energy
RWJ
FYT
Consumer Defensive
RWJ
FYT
Basic Materials
RWJ
FYT
Real Estate
RWJ
FYT
Communication Services
RWJ
FYT
Utilities
RWJ
FYT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWJ vs. FYT — Risk / Return Rank
RWJ
FYT
RWJ vs. FYT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWJ | FYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 1.83 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | 2.73 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 4.12 | -0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.39 | 11.64 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWJ | FYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.83 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.26 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.39 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.39 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
RWJ vs. FYT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWJ drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, which is greater than FYT's maximum drawdown of -50.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWJ and FYT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWJ | FYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.97% | -50.48% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -8.34% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.29% | -28.90% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.29% | -28.90% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.33% | -50.48% | -0.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -2.65% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.24% | -8.54% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 2.95% | +0.58% |
Volatility
RWJ vs. FYT - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) have volatilities of 4.64% and 4.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWJ | FYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 4.66% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 11.62% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.40% | 18.90% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 22.56% | +1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.14% | 25.96% | +0.18% |
RWJ vs. FYT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWJ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FYT's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWJ vs. FYT - Dividend Comparison
RWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than FYT's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.12% | 0.94% | 2.07% | 1.50% | 1.36% | 1.19% | 0.96% | 1.44% | 1.78% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 0.96% |
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 1.01% | 1.11% | 1.15% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 0.61% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 1.11% | 0.60% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, RWJ and FYT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FYT has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to RWJ (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWJ dropped -55.97% vs FYT's -50.48%.
On 10-year performance, RWJ leads with 13.02% vs 9.99% for FYT. On fees, RWJ is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RWJ has performed better with a 13.02% return vs 9.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RWJ is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for FYT.
FYT has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 1.01% for RWJ.
RWJ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index, while FYT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RWJ and 0.72% for FYT.
RWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWJ and FYT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer