PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWJ vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWJ vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWJ achieves a 16.99% return, which is significantly higher than AVDV's 13.22% return.


RWJ

1D
0.78%
1M
1.37%
YTD
16.99%
6M
17.05%
1Y
36.58%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
13.10%

AVDV

1D
0.26%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
13.22%
6M
16.29%
1Y
40.16%
3Y*
26.61%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWJ vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
16.99%7.75%11.81%16.21%-10.97%52.82%20.83%7.69%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
13.22%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between RWJ and AVDV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.68

The correlation between RWJ and AVDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RWJ vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RWJ
AVDV

Consumer Cyclical

23.9%
14.4%

Industrials

16.2%
21.3%

Healthcare

11.2%
2.1%

Financial Services

11.0%
13.7%

Technology

9.9%
6.4%

Energy

7.4%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
3.4%

Basic Materials

5.2%
22.5%

Real Estate

4.0%
1.1%

Communication Services

3.3%
2.0%

Utilities

0.9%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

RWJ
23.9%
AVDV
14.4%

Industrials

RWJ
16.2%
AVDV
21.3%

Healthcare

RWJ
11.2%
AVDV
2.1%

Financial Services

RWJ
11.0%
AVDV
13.7%

Technology

RWJ
9.9%
AVDV
6.4%

Energy

RWJ
7.4%
AVDV
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

RWJ
6.9%
AVDV
3.4%

Basic Materials

RWJ
5.2%
AVDV
22.5%

Real Estate

RWJ
4.0%
AVDV
1.1%

Communication Services

RWJ
3.3%
AVDV
2.0%

Utilities

RWJ
0.9%
AVDV
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWJ vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWJ
RWJ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
RWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWJ vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWJAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.46

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

3.06

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.40

12.34

-1.95

RWJ vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWJ and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWJAVDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.54

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.77

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.78

-0.32

Drawdowns

RWJ vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWJ drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, which is greater than AVDV's maximum drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWJ and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWJAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.97%

-43.01%

-12.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-13.19%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.29%

-14.17%

-15.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.29%

-28.08%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-3.74%

+3.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.23%

-6.77%

-2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

3.26%

+0.27%

Volatility

RWJ vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) is 4.80%, while Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that RWJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWJAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

5.49%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.38%

13.49%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.43%

15.92%

+3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.72%

17.35%

+6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.15%

19.75%

+6.40%

RWJ vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWJ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWJ vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

RWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than AVDV's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.81%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
1.00%1.11%1.15%1.34%1.02%0.61%0.89%1.22%1.44%1.11%0.60%0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWJ and AVDV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVDV has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to RWJ (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWJ dropped -55.97% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.33% vs 7.78% for RWJ. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, RWJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 7.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWJ.

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.00% for RWJ.

RWJ is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RWJ and 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWJ and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer