PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWIGX vs. AMCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWIGX vs. AMCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) and American Funds AMCAP Fund Class A (AMCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWIGX achieves a 16.57% return, which is significantly higher than AMCPX's 6.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RWIGX having a 12.56% annualized return and AMCPX not far behind at 12.36%.


RWIGX

1D
0.65%
1M
6.72%
YTD
16.57%
6M
18.15%
1Y
34.59%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
12.56%

AMCPX

1D
-0.77%
1M
3.82%
YTD
6.34%
6M
6.01%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
12.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWIGX vs. AMCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWIGX
Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6
16.57%25.09%14.21%20.87%-17.02%15.11%15.71%25.94%-10.32%24.95%
AMCPX
American Funds AMCAP Fund Class A
6.34%17.68%21.11%31.04%-28.67%20.57%21.42%26.35%-4.42%22.08%

Correlation

The correlation between RWIGX and AMCPX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.90

The correlation between RWIGX and AMCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWIGX vs. AMCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWIGX
RWIGX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RWIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RWIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

AMCPX
AMCPX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
AMCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
AMCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWIGX vs. AMCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) and American Funds AMCAP Fund Class A (AMCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWIGXAMCPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

1.56

+1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.57

2.19

+1.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.28

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

1.60

+1.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.67

6.51

+8.16

RWIGX vs. AMCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWIGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the AMCPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWIGX and AMCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWIGXAMCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

1.56

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.49

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.66

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.59

+0.05

Drawdowns

RWIGX vs. AMCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWIGX drawdown since its inception was -31.98%, smaller than the maximum AMCPX drawdown of -62.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWIGX and AMCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWIGXAMCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.98%

-62.37%

+30.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.50%

-14.18%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-19.71%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.03%

-36.90%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.98%

-36.90%

+4.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.77%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-9.58%

+4.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

3.49%

-1.11%

Volatility

RWIGX vs. AMCPX - Volatility Comparison

Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to American Funds AMCAP Fund Class A (AMCPX) at 3.57%. This indicates that RWIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWIGXAMCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

3.57%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

11.42%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.51%

14.56%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

19.24%

-4.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

18.72%

-2.67%

RWIGX vs. AMCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWIGX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than AMCPX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWIGX vs. AMCPX - Dividend Comparison

RWIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than AMCPX's 8.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMCPX
American Funds AMCAP Fund Class A
8.21%8.73%8.19%3.26%7.54%3.43%3.88%4.90%7.84%5.37%3.81%8.86%
RWIGX
Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6
9.36%10.86%8.23%3.44%2.45%7.16%1.53%2.90%7.37%6.94%5.60%4.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWIGX and AMCPX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWIGX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to AMCPX (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWIGX dropped -31.98% vs AMCPX's -62.37%.

RWIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWIGX and AMCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer