PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWIGX vs. AGTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWIGX vs. AGTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWIGX achieves a 16.57% return, which is significantly higher than AGTHX's 10.09% return. Over the past 10 years, RWIGX has underperformed AGTHX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while AGTHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.97% annualized return.


RWIGX

1D
0.65%
1M
6.72%
YTD
16.57%
6M
18.15%
1Y
34.59%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
12.56%

AGTHX

1D
-0.33%
1M
6.81%
YTD
10.09%
6M
9.70%
1Y
26.21%
3Y*
25.16%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
15.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWIGX vs. AGTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWIGX
Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6
16.57%25.09%14.21%20.87%-17.02%15.11%15.71%25.94%-10.32%24.95%
AGTHX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A
10.09%19.73%28.02%37.22%-30.75%19.32%37.83%28.16%-3.15%26.14%

Correlation

The correlation between RWIGX and AGTHX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.90

The correlation between RWIGX and AGTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWIGX vs. AGTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWIGX
RWIGX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RWIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RWIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

AGTHX
AGTHX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AGTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AGTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWIGX vs. AGTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWIGXAGTHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

1.77

+0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.57

2.43

+1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.32

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

1.95

+1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.67

7.61

+7.07

RWIGX vs. AGTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWIGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the AGTHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWIGX and AGTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWIGXAGTHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

1.77

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.62

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.81

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.71

-0.06

Drawdowns

RWIGX vs. AGTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWIGX drawdown since its inception was -31.98%, smaller than the maximum AGTHX drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWIGX and AGTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWIGXAGTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.98%

-51.91%

+19.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.50%

-13.76%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-21.57%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.03%

-36.38%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.98%

-36.38%

+4.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.33%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-9.20%

+4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

3.52%

-1.14%

Volatility

RWIGX vs. AGTHX - Volatility Comparison

Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX) at 3.67%. This indicates that RWIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWIGXAGTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

3.67%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

11.65%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.51%

15.15%

-1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

20.25%

-5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

19.69%

-3.64%

RWIGX vs. AGTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWIGX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than AGTHX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWIGX vs. AGTHX - Dividend Comparison

RWIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, less than AGTHX's 9.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGTHX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A
9.71%10.69%8.99%7.40%4.05%8.18%4.30%7.15%11.99%7.03%6.61%8.87%
RWIGX
Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6
9.36%10.86%8.23%3.44%2.45%7.16%1.53%2.90%7.37%6.94%5.60%4.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, RWIGX and AGTHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RWIGX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to AGTHX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWIGX dropped -31.98% vs AGTHX's -51.91%.

RWIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWIGX and AGTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer