RWDIX vs. EIGMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Redwood Managed Volatility Fund (RWDIX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX).
RWDIX is managed by Redwood. It was launched on Dec 18, 2013. EIGMX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jun 26, 2007.
Performance
RWDIX vs. EIGMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RWDIX vs. EIGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWDIX Redwood Managed Volatility Fund | -1.05% | 4.75% | 6.63% | 1.04% | -11.18% | 0.52% | -1.93% | 9.04% | -2.60% | 7.31% |
EIGMX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund | 2.43% | 11.37% | 8.69% | 6.99% | -0.47% | 2.19% | 3.59% | 9.76% | -3.29% | 4.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWDIX achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than EIGMX's 2.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RWDIX has underperformed EIGMX with an annualized return of 2.03%, while EIGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.84% annualized return.
RWDIX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 3.23%
- 5Y*
- 0.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.03%
EIGMX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 6.29%
- 1Y
- 11.95%
- 3Y*
- 9.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- 4.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RWDIX vs. EIGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWDIX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than EIGMX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RWDIX vs. EIGMX — Risk / Return Rank
RWDIX
EIGMX
RWDIX vs. EIGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Managed Volatility Fund (RWDIX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWDIX | EIGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 6.02 | -4.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 8.81 | -7.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 2.96 | -1.70 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 8.48 | -7.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 33.23 | -30.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWDIX | EIGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 6.02 | -4.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 2.38 | -2.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 1.94 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 1.57 | -1.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between RWDIX and EIGMX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RWDIX vs. EIGMX - Dividend Comparison
RWDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, less than EIGMX's 6.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWDIX Redwood Managed Volatility Fund | 5.09% | 4.90% | 5.82% | 7.60% | 0.47% | 6.36% | 5.42% | 3.59% | 2.59% | 5.52% | 5.14% | 1.17% |
EIGMX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund | 6.73% | 5.72% | 6.16% | 5.79% | 4.78% | 4.18% | 4.37% | 5.44% | 3.72% | 3.42% | 4.02% | 5.54% |
Drawdowns
RWDIX vs. EIGMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWDIX drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, which is greater than EIGMX's maximum drawdown of -9.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWDIX and EIGMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWDIX | EIGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.69% | -9.42% | -7.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.61% | -1.33% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.10% | -7.39% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.69% | -9.42% | -7.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.79% | -1.33% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.47% | -0.93% | -3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.34% | +0.56% |
Volatility
RWDIX vs. EIGMX - Volatility Comparison
Redwood Managed Volatility Fund (RWDIX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX) have volatilities of 1.02% and 0.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RWDIX | EIGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 0.98% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.52% | 1.56% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53% | 1.98% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.67% | 2.61% | +2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.32% | 2.50% | +1.82% |