RW vs. WBIF

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

RW (Rainwater Equity ETF) and WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.25% expense ratio.

Performance

RW vs. WBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rainwater Equity ETF (RW) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RW achieves a -1.17% return, which is significantly lower than WBIF's 9.84% return.

RW

• 1D: -2.41%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: -1.17%
• 6M: -2.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WBIF

• 1D: -1.94%
• 1M: 3.29%
• YTD: 9.84%
• 6M: 9.19%
• 1Y: 22.16%
• 3Y*: 8.16%
• 5Y*: 2.06%
• 10Y*: 5.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RW vs. WBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RW Rainwater Equity ETF	-1.17%	-0.05%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	9.84%	10.54%

Correlation

The correlation between RW and WBIF is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	0.62

RW vs. WBIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RW	WBIF
Industrials	41.7%	14.6%
Technology	33.4%	19.9%
Financial Services	7.6%	31.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	11.1%
Communication Services	5.0%	2.6%
Healthcare	2.1%	3.4%
Basic Materials	1.6%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	3.1%
Real Estate	0.3%	-
Utilities	0.3%	10.3%
Energy	0.2%	2.9%

Return for Risk

RW vs. WBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBIF

WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 62
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RW vs. WBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rainwater Equity ETF (RW) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RW	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	0.29	-0.37

Drawdowns

RW vs. WBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RW drawdown since its inception was -17.04%, smaller than the maximum WBIF drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RW and WBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	RW	WBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.04%	-20.29%	+3.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.60%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.11%	-2.54%	-4.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.09%	-7.73%	+2.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RW	WBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.85%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.80%	12.45%	+3.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.80%	12.88%	+2.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.80%	12.36%	+3.44%

RW vs. WBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RW and WBIF have an expense ratio of 1.25%.

Dividends

RW vs. WBIF - Dividend Comparison

RW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, more than WBIF's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RW Rainwater Equity ETF	0.10%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	0.06%	0.14%	1.17%	0.82%	0.96%	2.59%	0.09%	1.04%	0.77%	0.75%	0.67%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RW and WBIF in my portfolio?

RW and WBIF have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RW or WBIF?

Both ETFs have the same 1.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RW or WBIF?

RW and WBIF have the same expense ratio: 1.25% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RW or WBIF?

RW has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.06% for WBIF.

What is the main difference between RW and WBIF?

They also come from different issuers: Rainwater Equity and WBI.