RVT vs. XOM
RVT (Royce Value Trust Inc.) and XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) are both stocks. RVT operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while XOM operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 10 years, RVT returned 13.17%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for XOM. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RVT vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RVT achieves a 15.52% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 23.81% return. Over the past 10 years, RVT has outperformed XOM with an annualized return of 13.17%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.64% annualized return.
RVT
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 15.52%
- 6M
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- 33.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
XOM
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -6.91%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 6M
- 25.40%
- 1Y
- 35.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 23.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
RVT vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RVT Royce Value Trust Inc. | 15.52% | 11.54% | 17.93% | 18.79% | -26.25% | 32.66% | 18.16% | 35.41% | -20.70% | 30.63% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 23.81% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.09% | -3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between RVT and XOM is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987 | 0.32 |
The correlation between RVT and XOM shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RVT:
$2.16B
XOM:
$614.94B
RVT:
$4.02
XOM:
$5.93
RVT:
4.47
XOM:
24.80
RVT:
12.65
XOM:
1.93
RVT:
1.00
XOM:
2.42
RVT:
$170.31M
XOM:
$326.01B
RVT:
$304.06M
XOM:
$83.11B
RVT:
$439.27M
XOM:
$60.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RVT vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
RVT
XOM
RVT vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RVT | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.26 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.45 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.08 | 6.56 | +2.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RVT vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RVT drawdown since its inception was -72.34%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVT and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RVT | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.34% | -62.40% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.19% | -15.69% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.48% | -18.92% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.79% | -20.51% | -12.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.18% | -61.34% | +14.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -13.68% | +11.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.29% | -10.20% | -1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 5.84% | -2.38% |
Volatility
RVT vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT) is 6.60%, while Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a volatility of 9.08%. This indicates that RVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RVT | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 9.08% | -2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.90% | 20.51% | -6.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.35% | 24.51% | -6.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.50% | 26.77% | -4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.99% | 28.20% | -5.21% |
Dividends
RVT vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
RVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than XOM's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RVT Royce Value Trust Inc. | 8.02% | 8.82% | 8.04% | 7.35% | 9.95% | 8.52% | 6.44% | 7.45% | 10.68% | 7.17% | 7.62% | 10.54% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.78% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Financials
RVT vs. XOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royce Value Trust Inc. and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RVT and XOM have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOM has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to RVT (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVT dropped -72.34% vs XOM's -62.40%.
RVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RVT and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer