RVT vs. CVGRX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT) and Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX).

CVGRX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990.

Performance

RVT vs. CVGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT) and Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RVT vs. CVGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RVT Royce Value Trust Inc.	4.94%	11.54%	17.93%	18.79%	-26.25%	32.66%	18.16%	35.41%	-20.70%	30.63%
CVGRX Calamos Growth Fund	-13.66%	16.08%	32.32%	37.64%	-33.33%	23.06%	32.97%	31.11%	-6.14%	26.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVT achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly higher than CVGRX's -13.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RVT having a 12.47% annualized return and CVGRX not far behind at 12.11%.

RVT

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -7.98%
• YTD: 4.94%
• 6M: 8.21%
• 1Y: 27.19%
• 3Y*: 16.26%
• 5Y*: 6.80%
• 10Y*: 12.47%

CVGRX

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: -9.33%
• YTD: -13.66%
• 6M: -12.25%
• 1Y: 12.10%
• 3Y*: 17.50%
• 5Y*: 7.77%
• 10Y*: 12.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RVT vs. CVGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVT

RVT Risk / Return Rank: 78
RVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
RVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RVT Omega Ratio Rank: 75
RVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RVT Martin Ratio Rank: 84

CVGRX

CVGRX Risk / Return Rank: 21
CVGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
CVGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CVGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CVGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
CVGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVT vs. CVGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT) and Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RVT	CVGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	0.55	+0.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	0.95	+0.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.13	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	0.56	+1.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.08	2.15	+4.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RVT vs. CVGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVT Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the CVGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVT and CVGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RVT	CVGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	0.55	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.36	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.57	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.48	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between RVT and CVGRX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RVT vs. CVGRX - Dividend Comparison

RVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.55%, less than CVGRX's 10.21% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RVT Royce Value Trust Inc.	8.55%	8.82%	8.04%	7.35%	9.95%	8.52%	6.44%	7.45%	10.68%	7.17%	7.62%	10.54%
CVGRX Calamos Growth Fund	10.21%	8.81%	6.66%	4.48%	0.00%	12.17%	11.25%	9.71%	16.86%	13.75%	4.12%	35.24%

Drawdowns

RVT vs. CVGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVT drawdown since its inception was -72.34%, which is greater than CVGRX's maximum drawdown of -61.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVT and CVGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RVT	CVGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.34%	-61.65%	-10.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.67%	-16.00%	+2.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.79%	-37.43%	+4.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.18%	-37.43%	-9.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.41%	-16.00%	+6.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.34%	-11.55%	+0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.83%	4.18%	-0.35%

Volatility

RVT vs. CVGRX - Volatility Comparison

Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) at 6.33%. This indicates that RVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RVT	CVGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.72%	6.33%	+1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.70%	12.66%	+1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.99%	22.38%	-0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.35%	21.80%	+0.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.89%	21.50%	+1.39%