RVT vs. SBAC
RVT (Royce Value Trust Inc.) and SBAC (SBA Communications Corporation) are both stocks. RVT operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while SBAC operates in REIT - Specialty (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, RVT returned 13.17%/yr vs 8.40%/yr for SBAC. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RVT vs. SBAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RVT achieves a 15.52% return, which is significantly higher than SBAC's 7.24% return. Over the past 10 years, RVT has outperformed SBAC with an annualized return of 13.17%, while SBAC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.40% annualized return.
RVT
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 15.52%
- 6M
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- 33.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
SBAC
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- 1Y
- -7.99%
- 3Y*
- -1.81%
- 5Y*
- -6.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
RVT vs. SBAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RVT Royce Value Trust Inc. | 15.52% | 11.54% | 17.93% | 18.79% | -26.25% | 32.66% | 18.16% | 35.41% | -20.70% | 30.63% |
SBAC SBA Communications Corporation | 7.24% | -3.13% | -18.18% | -8.15% | -27.30% | 38.95% | 17.81% | 49.30% | -0.90% | 58.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between RVT and SBAC is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 1999 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RVT and SBAC has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
RVT:
$2.16B
SBAC:
$21.73B
RVT:
$4.02
SBAC:
$9.50
RVT:
4.47
SBAC:
21.55
RVT:
12.65
SBAC:
7.68
RVT:
$170.31M
SBAC:
$2.85B
RVT:
$304.06M
SBAC:
$1.28B
RVT:
$439.27M
SBAC:
$1.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RVT vs. SBAC — Risk / Return Rank
RVT
SBAC
RVT vs. SBAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT) and SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RVT | SBAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.98 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | -0.27 | +2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.08 | -0.51 | +9.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RVT vs. SBAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RVT drawdown since its inception was -72.34%, smaller than the maximum SBAC drawdown of -99.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVT and SBAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RVT | SBAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.34% | -99.65% | +27.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.19% | -29.80% | +17.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.48% | -32.21% | +8.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.79% | -54.50% | +21.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.18% | -54.50% | +7.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -43.24% | +40.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.29% | -35.39% | +24.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 15.94% | -12.48% |
Volatility
RVT vs. SBAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT) is 6.60%, while SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) has a volatility of 10.25%. This indicates that RVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RVT | SBAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 10.25% | -3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.90% | 27.71% | -13.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.35% | 32.49% | -14.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.50% | 29.34% | -6.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.99% | 28.12% | -5.13% |
Dividends
RVT vs. SBAC - Dividend Comparison
RVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than SBAC's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RVT Royce Value Trust Inc. | 8.02% | 8.82% | 8.04% | 7.35% | 9.95% | 8.52% | 6.44% | 7.45% | 10.68% | 7.17% | 7.62% | 10.54% |
SBAC SBA Communications Corporation | 2.30% | 2.30% | 1.92% | 1.34% | 1.01% | 0.60% | 0.66% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RVT vs. SBAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royce Value Trust Inc. and SBA Communications Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RVT and SBAC have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBAC has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to RVT (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVT dropped -72.34% vs SBAC's -99.65%.
RVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RVT and SBAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer