RVNU vs. THYM
RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) and THYM (T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RVNU is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index, while THYM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. RVNU is passively managed, while THYM is actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RVNU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for THYM.
Performance
RVNU vs. THYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RVNU achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly higher than THYM's 3.33% return.
RVNU
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 9.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
THYM
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 3.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RVNU vs. THYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.71% | -0.32% |
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 3.33% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between RVNU and THYM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RVNU vs. THYM — Risk / Return Rank
RVNU
THYM
RVNU vs. THYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF (THYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RVNU | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.89 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RVNU | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 1.62 | -1.23 |
Drawdowns
RVNU vs. THYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RVNU drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, which is greater than THYM's maximum drawdown of -2.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVNU and THYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RVNU | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.51% | -2.93% | -20.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | 0.00% | -2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -0.49% | -4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility
RVNU vs. THYM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RVNU | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.12% | 4.35% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.19% | 4.35% | +2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.27% | 4.35% | +2.92% |
RVNU vs. THYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RVNU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than THYM's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
RVNU vs. THYM - Dividend Comparison
RVNU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than THYM's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.52% | 3.46% | 3.06% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.18% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 2.76% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 3.01% |
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 2.18% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RVNU and THYM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for THYM.
RVNU has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 2.18% for THYM.
RVNU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while THYM is High Yield Muni. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for RVNU and 0.32% for THYM.
Find the right allocation for RVNU and THYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer