RVNU vs. SCMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) and SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - RVNU tracks the Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index while SCMB tracks the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RVNU returned 3.65%/yr vs 3.37%/yr for SCMB. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RVNU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCMB.

Performance

RVNU vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVNU achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 1.07% return.

RVNU

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 3.71%
• 6M: 3.08%
• 1Y: 9.62%
• 3Y*: 3.65%
• 5Y*: -0.23%
• 10Y*: 1.90%

SCMB

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 1.07%
• 6M: 1.55%
• 1Y: 6.86%
• 3Y*: 3.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVNU vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF	3.71%	0.58%	1.46%	11.19%	1.79%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	1.07%	3.78%	0.91%	5.86%	3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between RVNU and SCMB is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between RVNU and SCMB has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

RVNU vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVNU

RVNU Risk / Return Rank: 63
RVNU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
RVNU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RVNU Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RVNU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RVNU Martin Ratio Rank: 65

SCMB

SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 64
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVNU vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RVNU	SCMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.34	-0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	3.45	-0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.50	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	2.36	+1.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.69	7.89	+3.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RVNU vs. SCMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVNU Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the SCMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVNU and SCMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RVNU	SCMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	2.34	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.97	-0.59

Drawdowns

RVNU vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVNU drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, which is greater than SCMB's maximum drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVNU and SCMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	RVNU	SCMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.51%	-6.13%	-17.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.46%	-2.92%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.35%	-5.57%	-4.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.80%	-0.87%	-1.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-1.32%	-3.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	0.87%	-0.04%

Volatility

RVNU vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) at 1.04%. This indicates that RVNU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RVNU	SCMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	1.04%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.41%	2.17%	+1.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.12%	2.94%	+2.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.19%	4.16%	+3.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.27%	4.16%	+3.11%

RVNU vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RVNU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

RVNU vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison

RVNU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, which matches SCMB's 3.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF	3.52%	3.46%	3.06%	2.79%	2.81%	2.18%	2.43%	2.75%	2.76%	2.49%	2.72%	3.01%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	3.54%	3.36%	3.34%	3.10%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RVNU and SCMB in my portfolio?

RVNU and SCMB have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RVNU or SCMB?

RVNU has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to SCMB (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVNU dropped -23.51% vs SCMB's -6.13%.

Which ETF is better, RVNU or SCMB?

On 3-year performance, RVNU leads with 3.65% vs 3.37% for SCMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RVNU or SCMB?

Over the 3-year period, RVNU has performed better with a 3.65% return vs 3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RVNU or SCMB?

SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for RVNU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RVNU or SCMB?

SCMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 3.52% for RVNU.

What is the main difference between RVNU and SCMB?

RVNU tracks Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index, while SCMB tracks ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for RVNU and 0.03% for SCMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.