PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RVNU vs. HYUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RVNU vs. HYUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVNU achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly higher than HYUP's 1.63% return.


RVNU

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.38%
YTD
3.71%
6M
3.08%
1Y
9.62%
3Y*
3.65%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*
1.90%

HYUP

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.54%
YTD
1.63%
6M
2.12%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
10.16%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVNU vs. HYUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RVNU
Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF
3.71%0.58%1.46%11.19%-16.60%2.28%6.54%10.16%0.40%
HYUP
Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF
1.63%8.83%10.30%14.56%-13.30%5.13%5.73%16.54%-3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between RVNU and HYUP is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018

0.21

The correlation between RVNU and HYUP shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RVNU vs. HYUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVNU
RVNU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
RVNU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVNU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVNU Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RVNU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVNU Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

HYUP
HYUP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
HYUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYUP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
HYUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYUP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVNU vs. HYUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RVNUHYUPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

1.76

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.83

2.68

+0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

2.45

+1.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.69

10.46

+1.23

RVNU vs. HYUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVNU Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the HYUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVNU and HYUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RVNUHYUPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

1.76

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.53

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.52

-0.13

Drawdowns

RVNU vs. HYUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVNU drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, smaller than the maximum HYUP drawdown of -24.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVNU and HYUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RVNUHYUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.51%

-24.79%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-3.05%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.35%

-6.03%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

-18.06%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-0.36%

-2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-3.42%

-1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.71%

+0.12%

Volatility

RVNU vs. HYUP - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) at 1.35%. This indicates that RVNU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RVNUHYUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

1.35%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.41%

3.35%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.12%

4.24%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.19%

8.27%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.27%

9.75%

-2.48%

RVNU vs. HYUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RVNU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HYUP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RVNU vs. HYUP - Dividend Comparison

RVNU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than HYUP's 7.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYUP
Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF
7.33%7.44%7.78%7.48%7.15%6.19%6.89%6.77%6.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RVNU
Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF
3.52%3.46%3.06%2.79%2.81%2.18%2.43%2.75%2.76%2.49%2.72%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


RVNU and HYUP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RVNU has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to HYUP (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVNU dropped -23.51% vs HYUP's -24.79%.

On 5-year performance, HYUP leads with 4.39% vs -0.23% for RVNU. On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYUP has performed better with a 4.39% return vs -0.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HYUP.

HYUP has the higher dividend yield at 7.33%, compared with 3.52% for RVNU.

RVNU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while HYUP is High Yield Bonds. RVNU tracks Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index, while HYUP tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market High Beta Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for RVNU and 0.20% for HYUP.

RVNU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RVNU and HYUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer