RVNL vs. CLIP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RVNL (GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF) and CLIP (Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RVNL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while CLIP is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. RVNL is actively managed, while CLIP is passively managed. Over the past year, RVNL returned -27.50% vs 3.97% for CLIP. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. RVNL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CLIP.

Performance

RVNL vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF (RVNL) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVNL achieves a -54.72% return, which is significantly lower than CLIP's 1.71% return.

RVNL

• 1D: -16.80%
• 1M: 6.34%
• YTD: -54.72%
• 6M: -63.02%
• 1Y: -27.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLIP

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.71%
• 6M: 1.82%
• 1Y: 3.97%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVNL vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RVNL GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF	-54.72%	109.17%
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	1.71%	2.95%

Correlation

The correlation between RVNL and CLIP is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

RVNL vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVNL

RVNL Risk / Return Rank: 9
RVNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
RVNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
RVNL Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RVNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
RVNL Martin Ratio Rank: 6

CLIP

CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVNL vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF (RVNL) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RVNL	CLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	17.97	-18.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.62	81.28	-80.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	26.48	-25.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.38	142.41	-142.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.66	1,288.03	-1,288.69

RVNL vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVNL Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 17.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVNL and CLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RVNL vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVNL drawdown since its inception was -72.92%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVNL and CLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RVNL	CLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.92%	-0.08%	-72.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.92%	-0.03%	-72.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.28%	0.00%	-65.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.79%	-0.00%	-40.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.46%	0.00%	+41.46%

Volatility

RVNL vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF (RVNL) has a higher volatility of 47.24% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.07%. This indicates that RVNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RVNL	CLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	47.24%	0.07%	+47.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	95.47%	0.15%	+95.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	131.48%	0.22%	+131.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	126.64%	0.44%	+126.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	126.64%	0.44%	+126.20%

RVNL vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RVNL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

RVNL vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

RVNL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	3.90%	4.14%	5.11%	2.75%
RVNL GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RVNL and CLIP in my portfolio?

RVNL and CLIP have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RVNL or CLIP?

RVNL has higher volatility (47.24%) compared to CLIP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVNL dropped -72.92% vs CLIP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, RVNL or CLIP?

On 1-year performance, CLIP leads with 3.97% vs -27.50% for RVNL. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CLIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RVNL or CLIP?

Over the 1-year period, CLIP has performed better with a 3.97% return vs -27.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RVNL or CLIP?

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for RVNL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RVNL or CLIP?

CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 0.00% for RVNL.

What is the main difference between RVNL and CLIP?

RVNL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for RVNL and 0.07% for CLIP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.97 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.