RVMDW vs. BW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RVMDW (Revolution Medicines Inc. Warrant) and BW (Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.) are both stocks. RVMDW operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while BW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past year, RVMDW returned 3027.90% vs 1637.54% for BW. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RVMDW vs. BW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Revolution Medicines Inc. Warrant (RVMDW) and Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVMDW achieves a 688.38% return, which is significantly higher than BW's 157.29% return.

RVMDW

• 1D: 4.07%
• 1M: 26.88%
• YTD: 688.38%
• 6M: 680.00%
• 1Y: 3,027.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BW

• 1D: -10.47%
• 1M: -14.33%
• YTD: 157.29%
• 6M: 230.87%
• 1Y: 1,637.54%
• 3Y*: 37.03%
• 5Y*: 14.97%
• 10Y*: -22.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVMDW vs. BW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RVMDW Revolution Medicines Inc. Warrant	688.38%	422.17%	-45.45%	-67.00%
BW Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.	157.29%	286.59%	12.33%	-4.58%

Correlation

The correlation between RVMDW and BW is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023	0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap RVMDW : $1.47B BW : $2.13B
EPS RVMDW : -$7.17 BW : -$0.83
Total Revenue (TTM) RVMDW : $0.00 BW : $668.48M
Gross Profit (TTM) RVMDW : -$4.70M BW : $121.68M
EBITDA (TTM) RVMDW : -$1.34B BW : -$41.40M

Return for Risk

RVMDW vs. BW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVMDW

RVMDW Risk / Return Rank: 99
RVMDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
RVMDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
RVMDW Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RVMDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
RVMDW Martin Ratio Rank: 100

BW

BW Risk / Return Rank: 99
BW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BW Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BW Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BW Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BW Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVMDW vs. BW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Revolution Medicines Inc. Warrant (RVMDW) and Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RVMDW	BW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	12.97	13.09	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.05	5.56	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.76	1.68	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	51.49	49.16	+2.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	112.99	129.58	-16.59

RVMDW vs. BW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVMDW Sharpe Ratio is 12.97, which is comparable to the BW Sharpe Ratio of 13.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVMDW and BW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RVMDW vs. BW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVMDW drawdown since its inception was -96.90%, roughly equal to the maximum BW drawdown of -99.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVMDW and BW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RVMDW	BW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.90%	-99.89%	+2.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.65%	-33.71%	-25.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-95.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-97.39%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-99.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-93.11%	+93.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.06%	-82.82%	+16.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.13%	12.77%	+14.36%

Volatility

RVMDW vs. BW - Volatility Comparison

Revolution Medicines Inc. Warrant (RVMDW) has a higher volatility of 33.80% compared to Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) at 25.81%. This indicates that RVMDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RVMDW	BW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.80%	25.81%	+7.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	149.62%	88.27%	+61.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	237.26%	126.74%	+110.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	311.22%	110.34%	+200.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	311.22%	108.35%	+202.87%

Dividends

RVMDW vs. BW - Dividend Comparison

RVMDW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%.

Position	TTM
BW Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.	2.55%
RVMDW Revolution Medicines Inc. Warrant	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RVMDW and BW in my portfolio?

RVMDW and BW have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RVMDW or BW?

RVMDW has higher volatility (33.80%) compared to BW (25.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVMDW dropped -96.90% vs BW's -99.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.09 vs 12.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.