PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RUSHB vs. GOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RUSHB vs. GOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RUSHB achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than GOOG's 13.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RUSHB has underperformed GOOG with an annualized return of 23.02%, while GOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 25.80% annualized return.


RUSHB

1D
-0.06%
1M
-4.24%
YTD
15.65%
6M
18.51%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
19.90%
10Y*
23.02%

GOOG

1D
-0.76%
1M
-6.31%
YTD
13.43%
6M
11.09%
1Y
112.81%
3Y*
42.00%
5Y*
23.95%
10Y*
25.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RUSHB vs. GOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RUSHB
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
15.65%4.77%4.28%43.39%5.93%44.83%26.17%29.92%-25.72%56.17%
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
13.43%65.42%35.62%58.83%-38.67%65.17%31.03%29.10%-1.03%35.58%

Correlation

The correlation between RUSHB and GOOG is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2014

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RUSHB:

$5.17B

GOOG:

$4.35T

EPS

RUSHB:

$3.29

GOOG:

$13.11

PE Ratio

RUSHB:

19.65

GOOG:

27.12

PEG Ratio

RUSHB:

2.46

GOOG:

1.33

PS Ratio

RUSHB:

0.72

GOOG:

10.28

PB Ratio

RUSHB:

2.28

GOOG:

9.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

RUSHB:

$7.27B

GOOG:

$422.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RUSHB:

$1.43B

GOOG:

$255.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

RUSHB:

$500.50M

GOOG:

$174.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RUSHB vs. GOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RUSHB
RUSHB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
RUSHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RUSHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
RUSHB Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RUSHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
RUSHB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOG
GOOG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RUSHB vs. GOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RUSHBGOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.64

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

5.47

-4.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.30

19.89

-16.60

RUSHB vs. GOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RUSHB Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the GOOG Sharpe Ratio of 3.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RUSHB and GOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RUSHBGOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

3.98

-3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.77

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.89

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.82

-0.54

Drawdowns

RUSHB vs. GOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RUSHB drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than GOOG's maximum drawdown of -44.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUSHB and GOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RUSHBGOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

-44.60%

-37.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.59%

-20.75%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.48%

-29.35%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.48%

-44.60%

+16.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.03%

-44.60%

-13.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.32%

-10.87%

-6.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.22%

-8.89%

-14.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.82%

5.69%

+2.13%

Volatility

RUSHB vs. GOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB) is 6.76%, while Alphabet Inc (GOOG) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that RUSHB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RUSHBGOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

8.08%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.70%

20.16%

+3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.37%

28.59%

+3.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.53%

31.10%

+3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.51%

28.99%

+9.52%

Dividends

RUSHB vs. GOOG - Dividend Comparison

RUSHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than GOOG's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
0.24%0.26%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RUSHB
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
1.17%1.32%1.29%1.17%1.42%1.37%1.07%1.09%0.67%

Financials

RUSHB vs. GOOG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rush Enterprises, Inc. and Alphabet Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
1.68B
109.90B
(RUSHB) Total Revenue
(GOOG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RUSHB vs. GOOG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rush Enterprises, Inc. and Alphabet Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
20.4%
62.5%
Portfolio components
RUSHB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 343.80M and revenue of 1.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.4%.

GOOG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

RUSHB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 82.21M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

GOOG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

RUSHB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of 61.45M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

GOOG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RUSHB and GOOG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOG has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to RUSHB (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RUSHB dropped -82.05% vs GOOG's -44.60%.

GOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RUSHB and GOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer