PortfoliosLab logo
RUSHB vs. RUSHA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RUSHB and RUSHA is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RUSHB vs. RUSHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

2,800.00%3,000.00%3,200.00%3,400.00%3,600.00%3,800.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3,185.75%
2,885.69%
RUSHB
RUSHA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RUSHB:

0.65

RUSHA:

0.13

Sortino Ratio

RUSHB:

1.26

RUSHA:

0.63

Omega Ratio

RUSHB:

1.15

RUSHA:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

RUSHB:

0.96

RUSHA:

0.33

Martin Ratio

RUSHB:

4.11

RUSHA:

0.80

Ulcer Index

RUSHB:

6.63%

RUSHA:

10.60%

Daily Std Dev

RUSHB:

38.62%

RUSHA:

34.79%

Max Drawdown

RUSHB:

-82.05%

RUSHA:

-71.91%

Current Drawdown

RUSHB:

-10.28%

RUSHA:

-24.90%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RUSHB:

$4.11B

RUSHA:

$3.93B

EPS

RUSHB:

$3.57

RUSHA:

$3.57

PE Ratio

RUSHB:

15.80

RUSHA:

13.57

PEG Ratio

RUSHB:

2.74

RUSHA:

3.16

PS Ratio

RUSHB:

0.51

RUSHA:

0.51

PB Ratio

RUSHB:

2.06

RUSHA:

1.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

RUSHB:

$5.93B

RUSHA:

$5.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RUSHB:

$1.11B

RUSHA:

$1.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

RUSHB:

$495.15M

RUSHA:

$495.15M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RUSHB achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly higher than RUSHA's -11.74% return. Over the past 10 years, RUSHB has outperformed RUSHA with an annualized return of 17.90%, while RUSHA has yielded a comparatively lower 16.01% annualized return.


RUSHB

YTD

-1.60%

1M

-7.03%

6M

-3.69%

1Y

25.03%

5Y*

30.23%

10Y*

17.90%

RUSHA

YTD

-11.74%

1M

-9.41%

6M

-22.96%

1Y

4.60%

5Y*

24.95%

10Y*

16.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RUSHB vs. RUSHA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RUSHB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RUSHB is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RUSHB is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RUSHB is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RUSHB is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RUSHB is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RUSHB is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

RUSHA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RUSHA is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RUSHA is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RUSHA is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RUSHA is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RUSHA is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RUSHA is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RUSHB vs. RUSHA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RUSHB Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the RUSHA Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RUSHB and RUSHA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.65
0.13
RUSHB
RUSHA

Dividends

RUSHB vs. RUSHA - Dividend Comparison

RUSHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than RUSHA's 1.12% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
RUSHB
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
1.01%1.29%1.17%1.42%1.37%1.07%1.09%0.67%
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
1.12%1.28%1.23%1.53%1.33%0.98%1.08%0.70%

Drawdowns

RUSHB vs. RUSHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RUSHB drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than RUSHA's maximum drawdown of -71.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUSHB and RUSHA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-10.28%
-24.90%
RUSHB
RUSHA

Volatility

RUSHB vs. RUSHA - Volatility Comparison

Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) have volatilities of 8.48% and 8.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8.48%
8.83%
RUSHB
RUSHA

Financials

RUSHB vs. RUSHA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rush Enterprises, Inc. and Rush Enterprises, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
2.01B
2.01B
(RUSHB) Total Revenue
(RUSHA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RUSHB vs. RUSHA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rush Enterprises, Inc. and Rush Enterprises, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

18.0%19.0%20.0%21.0%22.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
18.4%
18.4%
(RUSHB) Gross Margin
(RUSHA) Gross Margin
RUSHB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 370.11M and revenue of 2.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.

RUSHA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 370.11M and revenue of 2.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.

RUSHB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.25M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.

RUSHA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.25M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.

RUSHB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of 74.75M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

RUSHA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of 74.75M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.