RUSHB vs. RUSHA
RUSHB (Rush Enterprises, Inc.) and RUSHA (Rush Enterprises, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Auto & Truck Dealerships industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, RUSHB returned 23.02%/yr vs 22.75%/yr for RUSHA. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RUSHB vs. RUSHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RUSHB achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly lower than RUSHA's 24.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RUSHB having a 23.02% annualized return and RUSHA not far behind at 22.75%.
RUSHB
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 25.73%
- 3Y*
- 18.41%
- 5Y*
- 19.90%
- 10Y*
- 23.02%
RUSHA
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- 24.36%
- 6M
- 24.04%
- 1Y
- 33.94%
- 3Y*
- 23.40%
- 5Y*
- 18.10%
- 10Y*
- 22.75%
RUSHB vs. RUSHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUSHB Rush Enterprises, Inc. | 15.65% | 4.77% | 4.28% | 43.39% | 5.93% | 44.83% | 26.17% | 29.92% | -25.72% | 56.17% |
RUSHA Rush Enterprises, Inc. | 24.36% | -0.15% | 10.44% | 46.73% | -4.51% | 36.44% | 35.37% | 36.49% | -31.74% | 59.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between RUSHB and RUSHA is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2002 | 0.79 |
The correlation between RUSHB and RUSHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
RUSHB:
$5.17B
RUSHA:
$5.33B
RUSHB:
$3.29
RUSHA:
$3.29
RUSHB:
19.65
RUSHA:
20.27
RUSHB:
2.46
RUSHA:
2.54
RUSHB:
0.72
RUSHA:
0.74
RUSHB:
2.28
RUSHA:
2.35
RUSHB:
$7.27B
RUSHA:
$7.27B
RUSHB:
$1.43B
RUSHA:
$1.43B
RUSHB:
$500.50M
RUSHA:
$500.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RUSHB vs. RUSHA — Risk / Return Rank
RUSHB
RUSHA
RUSHB vs. RUSHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RUSHB | RUSHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.21 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 1.64 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 4.01 | -0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RUSHB | RUSHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.12 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.59 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.69 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.43 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
RUSHB vs. RUSHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RUSHB drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than RUSHA's maximum drawdown of -71.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUSHB and RUSHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RUSHB | RUSHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -71.91% | -10.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.59% | -20.81% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.48% | -26.76% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.48% | -27.27% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.03% | -47.89% | -10.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.32% | -12.20% | -5.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.22% | -17.54% | -5.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.82% | 8.49% | -0.67% |
Volatility
RUSHB vs. RUSHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB) is 6.76%, while Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that RUSHB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RUSHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RUSHB | RUSHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.76% | 7.62% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.70% | 22.33% | +1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.37% | 30.54% | +1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.53% | 30.62% | +3.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.51% | 33.30% | +5.21% |
Dividends
RUSHB vs. RUSHA - Dividend Comparison
RUSHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than RUSHA's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUSHA Rush Enterprises, Inc. | 1.14% | 1.37% | 1.28% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.33% | 0.98% | 1.08% | 0.70% |
RUSHB Rush Enterprises, Inc. | 1.17% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.07% | 1.09% | 0.67% |
Financials
RUSHB vs. RUSHA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rush Enterprises, Inc. and Rush Enterprises, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RUSHB vs. RUSHA - Profitability Comparison
RUSHB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 343.80M and revenue of 1.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.4%.
RUSHA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 343.80M and revenue of 1.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.4%.
RUSHB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 82.21M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
RUSHA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 82.21M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
RUSHB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of 61.45M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
RUSHA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of 61.45M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RUSHB and RUSHA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RUSHA has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to RUSHB (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RUSHB dropped -82.05% vs RUSHA's -71.91%.
RUSHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RUSHB and RUSHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer