FSCC vs. CSB
FSCC (Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF) and CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. FSCC is actively managed, while CSB is passively managed. Over the past year, FSCC returned 44.27% vs 20.98% for CSB. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSCC charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSB.
Performance
FSCC vs. CSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSCC achieves a 20.60% return, which is significantly higher than CSB's 10.17% return.
FSCC
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 20.60%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 44.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSB
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 20.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
FSCC vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF | 20.60% | 15.30% | 2.15% |
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 10.17% | 2.26% | 1.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCC and CSB is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024 | 0.79 |
The correlation between FSCC and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
FSCC vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSCC
CSB
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
FSCC
CSB
Technology
FSCC
CSB
Healthcare
FSCC
CSB
Financial Services
FSCC
CSB
Consumer Cyclical
FSCC
CSB
Real Estate
FSCC
CSB
-
Energy
FSCC
CSB
Basic Materials
FSCC
CSB
Consumer Defensive
FSCC
CSB
Communication Services
FSCC
CSB
Utilities
FSCC
CSB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSCC vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank
FSCC
CSB
FSCC vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSCC | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.26 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 2.94 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.68 | 8.48 | +6.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSCC vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCC drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, smaller than the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCC and CSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCC | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.17% | -42.07% | +14.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.07% | -7.18% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.75% | +1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -7.11% | +2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.48% | +0.54% |
Volatility
FSCC vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) at 3.67%. This indicates that FSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSCC | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 3.67% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.11% | 9.23% | +4.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.61% | 14.48% | +5.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 18.70% | +3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 21.31% | +1.05% |
FSCC vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSCC has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSCC vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison
FSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than CSB's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.25% | 3.54% | 3.12% | 3.45% | 3.60% | 3.11% | 3.70% | 3.19% | 3.45% | 3.19% | 2.85% | 1.57% |
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSCC and CSB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSCC has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to CSB (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCC dropped -27.17% vs CSB's -42.07%.
On 1-year performance, FSCC leads with 44.27% vs 20.98% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FSCC has performed better with a 44.27% return vs 20.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FSCC.
CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 0.22% for FSCC.
They also come from different issuers: Federated Hermes and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FSCC and 0.35% for CSB.
FSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSCC and CSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer