RULE vs. MFUL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RULE (Adaptive Core ETF) and MFUL (Mindful Conservative ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Mohr. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RULE returned 14.33%/yr vs 4.38%/yr for MFUL. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 1.10% expense ratio.

Performance

RULE vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RULE achieves a 28.07% return, which is significantly higher than MFUL's 2.75% return.

RULE

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -6.27%
• 6M: 16.83%
• YTD: 28.07%
• 1Y: 31.15%
• 3Y*: 14.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.81%

MFUL

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.18%
• 6M: 1.42%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 1Y: 4.79%
• 3Y*: 4.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -0.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	$6.81K	$15.69K	$11.16K
RULE Adaptive Core ETF	$50.92K	$51.15K	$52.38K

RULE vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RULE Adaptive Core ETF	28.07%	4.60%	7.59%	6.29%	-22.87%	1.03%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	2.75%	4.51%	5.36%	2.24%	-12.46%	-1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RULE and MFUL is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021	0.68

The correlation between RULE and MFUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RULE vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RULE

RULE Risk / Return Rank: 45
RULE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
RULE Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RULE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
RULE Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
RULE Martin Ratio Rank: 53

MFUL

MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 42
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 42
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RULE vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RULE	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	1.07	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	1.49	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.20	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	1.38	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.20	4.99	+1.22

RULE vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RULE Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the MFUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RULE and MFUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RULE vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RULE drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, which is greater than MFUL's maximum drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RULE and MFUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	RULE	MFUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.48%	-16.41%	-14.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.49%	-3.36%	-16.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.21%	-4.74%	-15.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.67%	-0.97%	-13.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.72%	-9.20%	-5.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.76%	0.93%	+3.83%

Volatility

RULE vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison

Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) has a higher volatility of 12.03% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.07%. This indicates that RULE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RULE	MFUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.03%	1.07%	+10.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.87%	3.58%	+21.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.28%	4.31%	+22.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.87%	4.27%	+12.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.87%	4.27%	+12.60%

RULE vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RULE and MFUL have an expense ratio of 1.10%.

Dividends

RULE vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

RULE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	2.41%	3.31%	2.59%	5.00%	0.29%
RULE Adaptive Core ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.01%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RULE and MFUL in my portfolio?

RULE and MFUL have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RULE or MFUL?

RULE has higher volatility (12.03%) compared to MFUL (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RULE dropped -30.48% vs MFUL's -16.41%.

Which ETF is better, RULE or MFUL?

On 3-year performance, RULE leads with 14.33% vs 4.38% for MFUL. Both ETFs have the same 1.10% expense ratio. On volatility, MFUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RULE or MFUL?

Over the 3-year period, RULE has performed better with a 14.33% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RULE or MFUL?

RULE and MFUL have the same expense ratio: 1.10% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RULE or MFUL?

MFUL has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.00% for RULE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RULE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.