RULE vs. DBE

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RULE (Adaptive Core ETF) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RULE is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Mohr Funds, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. RULE is actively managed, while DBE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RULE returned 20.12%/yr vs 22.48%/yr for DBE. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. RULE charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.

Performance

RULE vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RULE achieves a 44.43% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.50% return.

RULE

• 1D: 2.91%
• 1M: 20.61%
• YTD: 44.43%
• 6M: 45.11%
• 1Y: 51.95%
• 3Y*: 20.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBE

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -3.65%
• YTD: 79.50%
• 6M: 72.59%
• 1Y: 82.31%
• 3Y*: 22.48%
• 5Y*: 19.20%
• 10Y*: 11.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RULE vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RULE Adaptive Core ETF	44.43%	4.60%	7.59%	6.29%	-22.87%	1.03%
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund	79.50%	-2.17%	2.96%	-12.14%	33.77%	-4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between RULE and DBE is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021	-0.02

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between RULE and DBE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.27, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

RULE vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RULE

RULE Risk / Return Rank: 78
RULE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
RULE Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
RULE Omega Ratio Rank: 75
RULE Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
RULE Martin Ratio Rank: 82

DBE

DBE Risk / Return Rank: 71
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 64
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RULE vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RULE	DBE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	2.37	+0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	2.91	+0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.39	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.13	6.10	-1.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.91	11.98	+4.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RULE vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RULE Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RULE and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RULE	DBE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	2.37	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.09	+0.37

Drawdowns

RULE vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RULE drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RULE and DBE.

Drawdown Indicators

	RULE	DBE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.48%	-86.69%	+56.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.65%	-14.41%	+1.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.21%	-23.89%	+3.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-60.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-31.85%	+31.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.99%	-57.31%	+42.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	7.34%	-4.25%

Volatility

RULE vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) is 9.65%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 13.47%. This indicates that RULE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RULE	DBE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.65%	13.47%	-3.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.55%	30.80%	-13.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.25%	35.02%	-14.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.83%	29.37%	-14.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.83%	28.33%	-13.50%

RULE vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RULE has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

RULE vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

RULE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund	2.15%	3.86%	6.32%	3.87%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	1.79%	1.67%
RULE Adaptive Core ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RULE and DBE in my portfolio?

RULE and DBE have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RULE or DBE?

DBE has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to RULE (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RULE dropped -30.48% vs DBE's -86.69%.

Which ETF is better, RULE or DBE?

On 3-year performance, DBE leads with 22.48% vs 20.12% for RULE. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, RULE has been the lower-risk option at 9.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RULE or DBE?

Over the 3-year period, DBE has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 20.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RULE or DBE?

DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for RULE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RULE or DBE?

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.00% for RULE.

What is the main difference between RULE and DBE?

RULE is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for RULE and 0.78% for DBE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RULE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.