RULE vs. DBE
RULE (Adaptive Core ETF) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RULE is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Mohr, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. RULE is actively managed, while DBE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RULE returned 14.33%/yr vs 17.16%/yr for DBE. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RULE charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
RULE vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RULE achieves a 28.07% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 78.87% return.
RULE
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -6.27%
- 6M
- 16.83%
- YTD
- 28.07%
- 1Y
- 31.15%
- 3Y*
- 14.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.81%
DBE
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 21.13%
- 6M
- 53.89%
- YTD
- 78.87%
- 1Y
- 68.62%
- 3Y*
- 17.16%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.24M | $1.18M | $1.76M | |
| $50.92K | $51.15K | $52.38K |
RULE vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RULE Adaptive Core ETF | 28.07% | 4.60% | 7.59% | 6.29% | -22.87% | 1.03% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 78.87% | -2.17% | 2.96% | -12.14% | 33.77% | -7.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between RULE and DBE is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021 | -0.01 |
The correlation between RULE and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RULE vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
RULE
DBE
RULE vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RULE | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.29 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.59 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.20 | 8.14 | -1.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RULE vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RULE drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RULE and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RULE | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.48% | -86.69% | +56.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.49% | -24.72% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.21% | -24.72% | +4.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.67% | -32.09% | +17.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.72% | -57.13% | +42.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 8.15% | -3.39% |
Volatility
RULE vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) is 12.03%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that RULE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RULE | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.03% | 14.12% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.87% | 33.95% | -9.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.28% | 37.47% | -10.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 30.09% | -13.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 28.58% | -11.71% |
RULE vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RULE has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
RULE vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
RULE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.16% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% |
RULE Adaptive Core ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RULE and DBE have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBE has higher volatility (14.12%) compared to RULE (12.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RULE dropped -30.48% vs DBE's -86.69%.
On 3-year performance, DBE leads with 17.16% vs 14.33% for RULE. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, RULE has been the lower-risk option at 12.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBE has performed better with a 17.16% return vs 14.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for RULE.
DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.00% for RULE.
RULE is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Mohr and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for RULE and 0.78% for DBE.
DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RULE and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer