PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RUDH.TO vs. PDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RUDH.TO vs. PDIV.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

RUDH.TO (RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF) and PDIV.TO (Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF) are both Dividend funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, RUDH.TO returned 12.79%/yr vs 9.14%/yr for PDIV.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RUDH.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF (RUDH.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RUDH.TO achieves a 7.78% return, which is significantly lower than PDIV.TO's 10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RUDH.TO has outperformed PDIV.TO with an annualized return of 12.79%, while PDIV.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.14% annualized return.

RUDH.TO

1D
0.17%
1M
2.17%
6M
6.98%
YTD
7.78%
1Y
14.55%
3Y*
14.35%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
12.79%

PDIV.TO

1D
0.41%
1M
1.92%
6M
8.93%
YTD
10.43%
1Y
20.67%
3Y*
12.26%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
9.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RUDH.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RUDH.TO
RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF		7.78%8.78%5.71%36.05%-20.27%46.37%0.96%40.86%-5.42%18.57%
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF		10.43%14.66%10.71%4.64%-4.39%20.18%-1.15%23.57%-15.24%26.84%

Correlation

The correlation between RUDH.TO and PDIV.TO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2014

0.16

Over the past year, RUDH.TO and PDIV.TO have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF

Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF

Often compared with PDIV.TO:
PDIV.TO vs. HDIV.TOPDIV.TO vs. MNY.TOPDIV.TO vs. VDY.TOPDIV.TO vs. HYLD.TOPDIV.TO vs. SPYIPDIV.TO vs. PDC.TOPDIV.TO vs. PMIF.TO

Return for Risk

RUDH.TO vs. PDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RUDH.TO
RUDH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
RUDH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RUDH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
RUDH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
RUDH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
RUDH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO
PDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RUDH.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF (RUDH.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RUDH.TOPDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.81
3.03

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.17
4.20

-3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.62

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

3.94

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.73

17.19

-14.46

RUDH.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RUDH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RUDH.TO and PDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RUDH.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RUDH.TO drawdown since its inception was -50.85%, which is greater than PDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUDH.TO and PDIV.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RUDH.TOPDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.85%

-30.64%

-20.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.38%

-5.27%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.44%

-8.82%

-25.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.85%

-15.93%

-34.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.85%

-30.64%

-20.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.69%

0.00%

-15.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.27%

-4.33%

-11.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.35%

1.21%

+4.14%

Volatility

RUDH.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF (RUDH.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) at 1.38%. This indicates that RUDH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RUDH.TOPDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

1.38%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

5.50%

+3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.96%

6.88%

+11.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

92.57%

10.06%

+82.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.23%

13.91%

+74.32%

Dividends

RUDH.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

RUDH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than PDIV.TO's 11.61% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF		11.61%11.23%12.35%11.84%6.38%5.59%6.33%5.85%6.80%25.71%5.38%8.10%
RUDH.TO
RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF		1.56%1.47%2.78%3.26%4.27%2.36%3.68%4.01%4.96%4.03%4.32%4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

RUDH.TO and PDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: RBC and Purpose Investments.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RUDH.TO and PDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer