RTXG vs. IBTF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RTXG (Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF) and IBTF (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RTXG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while IBTF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. RTXG is actively managed, while IBTF is passively managed. Over the past year, RTXG returned 41.48% vs 1.88% for IBTF. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. RTXG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTF.

Performance

RTXG vs. IBTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RTXG

• 1D: 5.07%
• 1M: 9.01%
• YTD: -4.29%
• 6M: -6.71%
• 1Y: 41.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBTF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 1.88%
• 3Y*: 3.74%
• 5Y*: 0.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTXG vs. IBTF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF	-4.29%	60.90%
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%	2.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RTXG and IBTF is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025	-0.04

Return for Risk

RTXG vs. IBTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTXG

RTXG Risk / Return Rank: 26
RTXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
RTXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
RTXG Omega Ratio Rank: 27
RTXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
RTXG Martin Ratio Rank: 23

IBTF

IBTF Risk / Return Rank: 99
IBTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
IBTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
IBTF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
IBTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
IBTF Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTXG vs. IBTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RTXG	IBTF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	6.63	-5.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	19.00	-17.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	6.14	-4.96
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	52.11	-50.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.78	263.51	-260.73

RTXG vs. IBTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTXG Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the IBTF Sharpe Ratio of 6.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTXG and IBTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RTXG vs. IBTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTXG drawdown since its inception was -37.49%, which is greater than IBTF's maximum drawdown of -10.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTXG and IBTF.

Drawdown Indicators

	RTXG	IBTF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.49%	-10.45%	-27.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.49%	-0.04%	-37.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.46%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.83%	0.00%	-26.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.63%	-3.30%	-6.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.97%	0.01%	+14.96%

Volatility

RTXG vs. IBTF - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) has a higher volatility of 18.81% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) at 0.00%. This indicates that RTXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RTXG	IBTF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.81%	0.00%	+18.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.71%	0.15%	+38.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.00%	0.34%	+49.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.19%	2.37%	+47.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.19%	2.55%	+47.64%

RTXG vs. IBTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTXG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTF's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

RTXG vs. IBTF - Dividend Comparison

RTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than IBTF's 2.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF	2.08%	3.83%	4.32%	4.03%	1.93%	0.57%	0.59%
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF	6.65%	6.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RTXG and IBTF in my portfolio?

RTXG and IBTF have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RTXG or IBTF?

RTXG has higher volatility (18.81%) compared to IBTF (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTXG dropped -37.49% vs IBTF's -10.45%.

Which ETF is better, RTXG or IBTF?

On 1-year performance, RTXG leads with 41.48% vs 1.88% for IBTF. On fees, IBTF is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTF has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RTXG or IBTF?

Over the 1-year period, RTXG has performed better with a 41.48% return vs 1.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RTXG or IBTF?

IBTF is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RTXG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RTXG or IBTF?

RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 6.65%, compared with 2.08% for IBTF.

What is the main difference between RTXG and IBTF?

RTXG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBTF is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RTXG and 0.07% for IBTF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.63 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.