RTXG vs. AGZD
RTXG (Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF) and AGZD (WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RTXG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while AGZD is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. RTXG is actively managed, while AGZD is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. RTXG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for AGZD.
Performance
RTXG vs. AGZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTXG achieves a -10.32% return, which is significantly lower than AGZD's 2.38% return.
RTXG
- 1D
- 7.53%
- 1M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- -10.32%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGZD
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- 1Y
- 5.37%
- 3Y*
- 6.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.35%
- 10Y*
- 3.21%
RTXG vs. AGZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF | -10.32% | 60.90% |
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 2.38% | 3.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTXG and AGZD is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTXG vs. AGZD — Risk / Return Rank
RTXG
AGZD
RTXG vs. AGZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTXG | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.65 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
RTXG vs. AGZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTXG drawdown since its inception was -37.49%, which is greater than AGZD's maximum drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTXG and AGZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTXG | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.49% | -8.46% | -29.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.45% | -0.24% | -31.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.76% | -0.77% | -7.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.28% | — |
Volatility
RTXG vs. AGZD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTXG | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.13% | 2.89% | +46.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.13% | 3.59% | +45.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.13% | 3.72% | +45.41% |
RTXG vs. AGZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTXG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AGZD's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
RTXG vs. AGZD - Dividend Comparison
RTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, more than AGZD's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.98% | 4.12% | 3.96% | 6.07% | 8.61% | 1.66% | 2.28% | 2.83% | 2.62% | 2.31% | 1.81% | 1.66% |
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF | 7.10% | 6.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RTXG and AGZD have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AGZD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGZD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RTXG.
RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 7.10%, compared with 3.98% for AGZD.
RTXG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AGZD is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RTXG and 0.23% for AGZD.
Find the right allocation for RTXG and AGZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer