PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTXAX vs. MBXAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTXAX vs. MBXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTXAX achieves a 17.12% return, which is significantly higher than MBXAX's 13.56% return.


RTXAX

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.63%
6M
10.40%
YTD
17.12%
1Y
27.71%
3Y*
11.13%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.48%

MBXAX

1D
0.73%
1M
-1.32%
6M
9.10%
YTD
13.56%
1Y
18.00%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
7.59%
ALL TIME*
8.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RTXAX vs. MBXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RTXAX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund
17.12%13.56%1.50%7.40%-11.66%26.57%3.73%6.17%
MBXAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund
13.56%4.13%13.17%-0.91%7.46%16.62%-0.72%6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between RTXAX and MBXAX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019

0.47

The correlation between RTXAX and MBXAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTXAX vs. MBXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RTXAX
RTXAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RTXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RTXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

MBXAX
MBXAX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MBXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RTXAX vs. MBXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RTXAXMBXAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.23

4.17

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.69

16.27

+2.42

RTXAX vs. MBXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTXAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the MBXAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTXAX and MBXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RTXAX vs. MBXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTXAX drawdown since its inception was -40.68%, which is greater than MBXAX's maximum drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTXAX and MBXAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTXAXMBXAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.68%

-31.75%

-8.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.21%

-3.89%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.13%

-15.66%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.63%

-15.66%

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-1.98%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-4.00%

-3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

1.01%

+0.44%

Volatility

RTXAX vs. MBXAX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) at 1.78%. This indicates that RTXAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTXAXMBXAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

1.78%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.27%

4.91%

+3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.82%

6.90%

+3.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.75%

11.39%

+4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.89%

13.36%

+6.53%

RTXAX vs. MBXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTXAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXAX's 2.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTXAX vs. MBXAX - Dividend Comparison

RTXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, while MBXAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MBXAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%2.43%2.02%7.57%0.00%3.92%4.96%3.07%3.35%1.82%
RTXAX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund
2.44%2.86%2.05%1.98%3.11%1.74%1.71%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTXAX and MBXAX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RTXAX has higher volatility (2.45%) compared to MBXAX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTXAX dropped -40.68% vs MBXAX's -31.75%.

RTXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTXAX and MBXAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer