PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTX vs. KMLM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTX vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RTX Corporation (RTX) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTX achieves a 17.77% return, which is significantly higher than KMLM's 12.68% return.


RTX

1D
-0.40%
1M
12.99%
6M
8.06%
YTD
17.77%
1Y
37.50%
3Y*
37.47%
5Y*
22.45%
10Y*
16.85%
ALL TIME*
12.55%

KMLM

1D
-1.05%
1M
6.25%
6M
10.01%
YTD
12.68%
1Y
16.85%
3Y*
0.32%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.43M$9.53M$7.88M
$1.31B$1.06B$1.03B

RTX vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RTX
RTX Corporation
17.77%61.44%40.76%-14.44%20.01%23.27%0.39%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
12.68%-2.98%-1.69%-5.66%30.61%7.04%5.74%

Correlation

The correlation between RTX and KMLM is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTX vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RTX
RTX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
RTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

KMLM
KMLM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
KMLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMLM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
KMLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMLM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RTX vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RTX Corporation (RTX) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RTXKMLMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.76

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.89

5.73

-0.85

RTX vs. KMLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the KMLM Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTX and KMLM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RTX vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTX drawdown since its inception was -55.14%, which is greater than KMLM's maximum drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTX and KMLM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTXKMLMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.14%

-27.47%

-27.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.32%

-9.61%

-9.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.58%

-22.28%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.84%

-27.47%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-12.14%

+10.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.02%

-12.79%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.70%

2.95%

+4.75%

Volatility

RTX vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison

RTX Corporation (RTX) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 3.71%. This indicates that RTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTXKMLMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.56%

3.71%

+5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

10.32%

+9.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.68%

11.62%

+14.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.22%

14.53%

+9.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.94%

14.67%

+13.27%

Dividends

RTX vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison

RTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than KMLM's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
4.46%5.02%0.82%0.00%13.22%6.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RTX
RTX Corporation
1.29%1.46%2.14%2.76%2.14%2.33%21.21%1.96%2.66%2.13%2.39%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTX and KMLM have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RTX has higher volatility (9.56%) compared to KMLM (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTX dropped -55.14% vs KMLM's -27.47%.

KMLM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTX and KMLM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer