RTWO.L vs. SXRQ.DE
RTWO.L (L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc) and SXRQ.DE (iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - RTWO.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Index, while SXRQ.DE is a European Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 10. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RTWO.L returned 11.22%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SXRQ.DE. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RTWO.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SXRQ.DE.
Performance
RTWO.L vs. SXRQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RTWO.L is traded in USD, while SXRQ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SXRQ.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTWO.L achieves a 16.74% return, which is significantly higher than SXRQ.DE's -1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, RTWO.L has outperformed SXRQ.DE with an annualized return of 11.22%, while SXRQ.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.05% annualized return.
RTWO.L
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 16.74%
- 6M
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 35.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
SXRQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- -1.09%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 1.87%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- -3.25%
- 10Y*
- 0.05%
RTWO.L vs. SXRQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTWO.L L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc | 16.74% | 11.33% | 9.23% | 20.06% | -18.68% | 19.21% | 19.82% | 24.50% | -12.79% | 14.73% |
SXRQ.DE iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | -1.09% | 14.80% | -4.87% | 12.15% | -24.32% | -10.74% | 14.28% | 4.44% | -3.54% | 15.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTWO.L and SXRQ.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2009 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, RTWO.L and SXRQ.DE have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTWO.L vs. SXRQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RTWO.L
SXRQ.DE
RTWO.L vs. SXRQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L) and iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RTWO.L | SXRQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.04 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 0.28 | +3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.63 | 0.74 | +11.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTWO.L | SXRQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 0.21 | +1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | -0.29 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.01 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.06 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
RTWO.L vs. SXRQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTWO.L drawdown since its inception was -42.35%, which is greater than SXRQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTWO.L and SXRQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTWO.L | SXRQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.35% | -39.07% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.08% | -6.69% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.96% | -10.78% | -16.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -37.06% | +7.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | -39.07% | -3.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -18.27% | +18.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -11.47% | +3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 2.54% | +0.25% |
Volatility
RTWO.L vs. SXRQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRQ.DE) at 2.61%. This indicates that RTWO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXRQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTWO.L | SXRQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 2.61% | +2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.25% | 6.88% | +5.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.98% | 9.01% | +7.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 10.93% | +10.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 9.59% | +11.89% |
RTWO.L vs. SXRQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTWO.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRQ.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RTWO.L vs. SXRQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither RTWO.L nor SXRQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RTWO.L and SXRQ.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXRQ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXRQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RTWO.L.
RTWO.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SXRQ.DE is European Government Bonds. RTWO.L tracks Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Index, while SXRQ.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 10. They also come from different issuers: L&G and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RTWO.L and 0.15% for SXRQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for RTWO.L and SXRQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer