RTWO.L vs. R2US.L
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L) and SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2US.L).
RTWO.L and R2US.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RTWO.L is a passively managed fund by L&G that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Index. It was launched on Sep 11, 2008. R2US.L is a passively managed fund by State Street Global Advisors that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on Jun 30, 2014. Both RTWO.L and R2US.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RTWO.L vs. R2US.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RTWO.L vs. R2US.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTWO.L L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc | 2.11% | 11.33% | 9.23% | 20.06% | -18.68% | 19.21% | 19.82% | 24.50% | -12.79% | 14.73% |
R2US.L SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF | 1.82% | 12.34% | 10.15% | 18.73% | -21.12% | 14.48% | 19.82% | 24.58% | -12.50% | 14.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTWO.L achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly higher than R2US.L's 1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, RTWO.L has outperformed R2US.L with an annualized return of 10.34%, while R2US.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return.
RTWO.L
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 12.80%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
R2US.L
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 4.66%
- 1Y
- 26.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.27%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RTWO.L vs. R2US.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RTWO.L and R2US.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Return for Risk
RTWO.L vs. R2US.L — Risk / Return Rank
RTWO.L
R2US.L
RTWO.L vs. R2US.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L) and SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2US.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RTWO.L | R2US.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.27 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 1.81 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 2.53 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | 7.93 | +0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTWO.L | R2US.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.27 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.16 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.44 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.36 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between RTWO.L and R2US.L is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RTWO.L vs. R2US.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither RTWO.L nor R2US.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
RTWO.L vs. R2US.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTWO.L drawdown since its inception was -42.35%, roughly equal to the maximum R2US.L drawdown of -42.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTWO.L and R2US.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTWO.L | R2US.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.35% | -42.19% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.19% | -14.35% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -32.04% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | -42.19% | -0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.89% | -6.94% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -10.00% | +2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 3.28% | -0.41% |
Volatility
RTWO.L vs. R2US.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L) is 6.72%, while SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2US.L) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that RTWO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than R2US.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RTWO.L | R2US.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 7.20% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.26% | 13.45% | -1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.41% | 21.06% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 22.23% | -1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 21.94% | -0.53% |