PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXRQ.DE vs. 10AL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXRQ.DE vs. 10AL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRQ.DE) and Amundi Index J.P. Morgan EMU Government Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXRQ.DE achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than 10AL.DE's 0.10% return.


SXRQ.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
0.68%
YTD
0.06%
6M
-0.05%
1Y
0.15%
3Y*
2.62%
5Y*
-2.34%
10Y*
-0.18%

10AL.DE

1D
0.07%
1M
0.59%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.03%
1Y
-0.09%
3Y*
2.33%
5Y*
-2.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRQ.DE vs. 10AL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SXRQ.DE
iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.06%1.69%0.90%8.71%-19.90%-3.09%4.11%6.70%1.39%
10AL.DE
Amundi Index J.P. Morgan EMU Government Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist
0.10%0.67%1.54%6.66%-17.93%-3.35%4.91%7.30%0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SXRQ.DE and 10AL.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018

0.87

The correlation between SXRQ.DE and 10AL.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.87 (all time) to 0.98 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXRQ.DE vs. 10AL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXRQ.DE
SXRQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SXRQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

10AL.DE
10AL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
10AL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
10AL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
10AL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
10AL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
10AL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRQ.DE vs. 10AL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRQ.DE) and Amundi Index J.P. Morgan EMU Government Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXRQ.DE10AL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.00

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

-0.03

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.10

-0.07

+0.16

SXRQ.DE vs. 10AL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXRQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is higher than the 10AL.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXRQ.DE and 10AL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXRQ.DE10AL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

-0.02

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

-0.35

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

-0.05

+0.45

Drawdowns

SXRQ.DE vs. 10AL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, which is greater than 10AL.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRQ.DE and 10AL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXRQ.DE10AL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.28%

-22.08%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.08%

-3.42%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.53%

-4.05%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.93%

-21.09%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.74%

-13.80%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.76%

-8.93%

+3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.34%

+0.21%

Volatility

SXRQ.DE vs. 10AL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.84% compared to Amundi Index J.P. Morgan EMU Government Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AL.DE) at 1.70%. This indicates that SXRQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 10AL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXRQ.DE10AL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

1.70%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.18%

3.57%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.00%

4.28%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.38%

6.19%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.97%

5.51%

+0.46%

SXRQ.DE vs. 10AL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXRQ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than 10AL.DE's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXRQ.DE vs. 10AL.DE - Dividend Comparison

SXRQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 10AL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
10AL.DE
Amundi Index J.P. Morgan EMU Government Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist
2.66%2.66%2.02%1.85%2.21%1.81%1.89%2.10%1.67%
SXRQ.DE
iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SXRQ.DE and 10AL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, 10AL.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

10AL.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SXRQ.DE.

SXRQ.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 10, while 10AL.DE tracks JP Morgan EMU Government Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXRQ.DE and 0.14% for 10AL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRQ.DE and 10AL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer