RTRE vs. RSEE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RTRE (Rareview Total Return Bond ETF) and RSEE (Rareview Systematic Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RTRE is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Rareview, while RSEE is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Rareview. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RTRE returned 2.02% vs 27.80% for RSEE. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RTRE charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for RSEE.

Performance

RTRE vs. RSEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Total Return Bond ETF (RTRE) and Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTRE achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than RSEE's 12.37% return.

RTRE

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -1.14%
• 6M: -1.06%
• YTD: -0.60%
• 1Y: 2.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.55%

RSEE

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -1.13%
• 6M: 7.50%
• YTD: 12.37%
• 1Y: 27.80%
• 3Y*: 16.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF	$324.23K	$242.26K	$286.56K
RTRE Rareview Total Return Bond ETF	$346.64K	$315.01K	$316.99K

RTRE vs. RSEE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RTRE Rareview Total Return Bond ETF	-0.60%	6.61%	1.77%
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF	12.37%	20.54%	7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between RTRE and RSEE is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2024	0.29

The correlation between RTRE and RSEE shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RTRE vs. RSEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RTRE

RTRE Risk / Return Rank: 19
RTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
RTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
RTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 18
RTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
RTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 19

RSEE

RSEE Risk / Return Rank: 56
RSEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
RSEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
RSEE Omega Ratio Rank: 53
RSEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
RSEE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RTRE vs. RSEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Total Return Bond ETF (RTRE) and Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RTRE	RSEE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	1.44	-0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	2.00	-1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.25	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	2.17	-1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.35	8.11	-6.76

RTRE vs. RSEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the RSEE Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTRE and RSEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RTRE vs. RSEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTRE drawdown since its inception was -4.99%, smaller than the maximum RSEE drawdown of -21.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTRE and RSEE.

Drawdown Indicators

	RTRE	RSEE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-21.60%	+16.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.70%	-12.89%	+9.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.86%	-4.01%	+1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.49%	-3.77%	+2.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.50%	3.44%	-1.94%

Volatility

RTRE vs. RSEE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rareview Total Return Bond ETF (RTRE) is 1.13%, while Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that RTRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RTRE	RSEE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.13%	5.91%	-4.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.51%	16.14%	-12.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.24%	19.40%	-15.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.74%	19.20%	-14.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.74%	19.20%	-14.46%

RTRE vs. RSEE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTRE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than RSEE's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

RTRE vs. RSEE - Dividend Comparison

RTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, while RSEE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF	0.00%	0.24%	9.02%	0.84%	1.97%
RTRE Rareview Total Return Bond ETF	4.49%	4.02%	3.33%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RTRE and RSEE in my portfolio?

RTRE and RSEE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RTRE or RSEE?

RSEE has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to RTRE (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTRE dropped -4.99% vs RSEE's -21.60%.

Which ETF is better, RTRE or RSEE?

On 1-year performance, RSEE leads with 27.80% vs 2.02% for RTRE. On fees, RTRE is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, RTRE has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RTRE or RSEE?

Over the 1-year period, RSEE has performed better with a 27.80% return vs 2.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RTRE or RSEE?

RTRE is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for RSEE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RTRE or RSEE?

RTRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 0.00% for RSEE.

What is the main difference between RTRE and RSEE?

RTRE is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while RSEE is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for RTRE and 1.27% for RSEE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.