RTO vs. ECL
RTO (Rentokil Initial PLC) and ECL (Ecolab Inc.) are both stocks. RTO operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while ECL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, RTO returned 10.46%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for ECL. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RTO vs. ECL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTO achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than ECL's -2.86% return. Over the past 10 years, RTO has outperformed ECL with an annualized return of 10.46%, while ECL has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.
RTO
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -12.01%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 6.53%
- 1Y
- 28.31%
- 3Y*
- -7.76%
- 5Y*
- -0.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
ECL
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- -2.86%
- 6M
- -3.29%
- 1Y
- -3.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
RTO vs. ECL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTO Rentokil Initial PLC | 2.23% | 19.64% | -9.78% | -5.92% | -22.27% | 14.36% | 16.84% | 42.28% | -0.22% | 64.45% |
ECL Ecolab Inc. | -2.86% | 13.19% | 19.29% | 37.94% | -37.10% | 9.38% | 13.17% | 32.26% | 11.07% | 15.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTO and ECL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007 | 0.27 |
The correlation between RTO and ECL shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RTO:
$15.10B
ECL:
$72.15B
RTO:
$1.39
ECL:
$7.40
RTO:
21.43
ECL:
34.38
RTO:
11.62
ECL:
1.82
RTO:
1.32
ECL:
4.40
RTO:
3.70
ECL:
7.21
RTO:
$11.42B
ECL:
$16.45B
RTO:
$1.54B
ECL:
$7.29B
RTO:
$2.16B
ECL:
$3.28B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTO vs. ECL — Risk / Return Rank
RTO
ECL
RTO vs. ECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) and Ecolab Inc. (ECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RTO | ECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.99 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | -0.19 | +2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | -0.45 | +5.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTO | ECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | -0.19 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.19 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.36 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.55 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
RTO vs. ECL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTO drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than ECL's maximum drawdown of -47.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTO and ECL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTO | ECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -47.19% | -39.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.56% | -20.09% | +4.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.81% | -20.09% | -29.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.94% | -43.70% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.94% | -43.70% | -7.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.90% | -17.30% | -7.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.53% | -7.98% | -22.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.38% | 8.45% | -3.07% |
Volatility
RTO vs. ECL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) is 6.03%, while Ecolab Inc. (ECL) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that RTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTO | ECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 6.90% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.63% | 15.58% | +6.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.49% | 20.46% | +10.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.41% | 23.81% | +10.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.03% | 24.98% | +8.05% |
Dividends
RTO vs. ECL - Dividend Comparison
RTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than ECL's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECL Ecolab Inc. | 1.09% | 1.02% | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.42% | 0.83% | 0.87% | 0.96% | 1.15% | 1.13% | 1.21% | 1.17% |
RTO Rentokil Initial PLC | 2.31% | 2.23% | 2.28% | 1.73% | 1.38% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.87% | 1.14% | 1.69% | 2.99% | 1.54% |
Financials
RTO vs. ECL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rentokil Initial PLC and Ecolab Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RTO vs. ECL - Profitability Comparison
RTO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported a gross profit of 363.77M and revenue of 2.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.9%.
ECL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.77B and revenue of 4.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.
RTO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported an operating income of 363.77M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.
ECL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported an operating income of 622.00M and revenue of 4.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.
RTO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported a net income of 208.50M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.
ECL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported a net income of 432.60M and revenue of 4.07B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RTO and ECL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECL has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to RTO (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTO dropped -86.53% vs ECL's -47.19%.
RTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RTO and ECL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer