RTO vs. ECL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) and Ecolab Inc. (ECL).

Performance

RTO vs. ECL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) and Ecolab Inc. (ECL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RTO vs. ECL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RTO Rentokil Initial PLC	6.86%	19.64%	-9.78%	-5.92%	-22.27%	14.36%	16.84%	42.28%	-0.22%	64.45%
ECL Ecolab Inc.	1.60%	13.19%	19.29%	37.94%	-37.10%	9.38%	13.17%	32.26%	11.07%	15.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap RTO : $15.98B ECL : $75.60B
EPS RTO : $1.39 ECL : $7.28
PE Ratio RTO : 22.68 ECL : 36.53
PEG Ratio RTO : 12.29 ECL : 1.93
PS Ratio RTO : 1.40 ECL : 4.71
PB Ratio RTO : 3.92 ECL : 7.74
Total Revenue (TTM) RTO : $11.42B ECL : $16.08B
Gross Profit (TTM) RTO : $1.54B ECL : $5.31B
EBITDA (TTM) RTO : $2.16B ECL : $3.30B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTO achieves a 6.86% return, which is significantly higher than ECL's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, RTO has outperformed ECL with an annualized return of 11.57%, while ECL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.18% annualized return.

RTO

• 1D: 2.98%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 6.86%
• 6M: 24.67%
• 1Y: 41.35%
• 3Y*: -2.89%
• 5Y*: -0.48%
• 10Y*: 11.57%

ECL

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: -13.50%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: -2.33%
• 1Y: 6.02%
• 3Y*: 18.37%
• 5Y*: 5.33%
• 10Y*: 10.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RTO vs. ECL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTO

RTO Risk / Return Rank: 81
RTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
RTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
RTO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
RTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
RTO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

ECL

ECL Risk / Return Rank: 50
ECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
ECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ECL Omega Ratio Rank: 43
ECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
ECL Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTO vs. ECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) and Ecolab Inc. (ECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RTO	ECL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	0.29	+0.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	0.53	+1.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.07	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	0.47	+2.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.49	1.35	+7.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RTO vs. ECL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the ECL Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTO and ECL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RTO	ECL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	0.29	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.23	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.41	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.56	-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between RTO and ECL is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RTO vs. ECL - Dividend Comparison

RTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than ECL's 1.04% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RTO Rentokil Initial PLC	2.08%	2.23%	2.28%	1.73%	1.38%	1.30%	0.00%	0.87%	1.14%	1.69%	2.99%	1.54%
ECL Ecolab Inc.	1.04%	1.02%	1.01%	1.09%	1.42%	0.83%	0.87%	0.96%	1.15%	1.13%	1.21%	1.17%

Drawdowns

RTO vs. ECL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTO drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than ECL's maximum drawdown of -47.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTO and ECL.

Drawdown Indicators

	RTO	ECL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.53%	-47.19%	-39.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.05%	-16.60%	+2.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.94%	-43.70%	-7.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.94%	-43.70%	-7.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.50%	-13.50%	-8.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.65%	-7.94%	-22.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.88%	5.71%	-0.83%

Volatility

RTO vs. ECL - Volatility Comparison

Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) has a higher volatility of 14.23% compared to Ecolab Inc. (ECL) at 6.93%. This indicates that RTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RTO	ECL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.23%	6.93%	+7.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.52%	15.11%	+8.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.20%	21.00%	+12.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.48%	23.69%	+10.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.00%	24.84%	+8.16%

Financials

RTO vs. ECL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rentokil Initial PLC and Ecolab Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported a gross profit of 363.77M and revenue of 2.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.9%.

ECL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported an operating income of 363.77M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

ECL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported an operating income of 680.50M and revenue of 4.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

RTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported a net income of 208.50M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.

ECL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported a net income of 563.90M and revenue of 4.20B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.