PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTHAX vs. TMNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTHAX vs. TMNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) and Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTHAX achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than TMNIX's 0.40% return.


RTHAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.74%
6M
0.84%
YTD
1.73%
1Y
6.16%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
0.14%
10Y*
2.62%
ALL TIME*
3.13%

TMNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.95%
6M
-0.14%
YTD
0.40%
1Y
4.98%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
1.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RTHAX vs. TMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
1.73%2.11%4.49%7.78%-13.62%5.54%3.84%10.18%0.37%
TMNIX
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund
0.40%2.56%3.92%6.85%-3.12%2.96%6.73%8.70%0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RTHAX and TMNIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018

0.59

The correlation between RTHAX and TMNIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTHAX vs. TMNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RTHAX
RTHAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RTHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
RTHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

TMNIX
TMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
TMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RTHAX vs. TMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) and Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RTHAXTMNIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.45

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.22

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.77

5.64

+3.13

RTHAX vs. TMNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the TMNIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTHAX and TMNIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RTHAX vs. TMNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTHAX drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, which is greater than TMNIX's maximum drawdown of -4.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTHAX and TMNIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTHAXTMNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.89%

-4.63%

-14.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-2.26%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.07%

-4.61%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.80%

-4.61%

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-1.95%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-1.46%

-2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.89%

-0.18%

Volatility

RTHAX vs. TMNIX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX) at 0.78%. This indicates that RTHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTHAXTMNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

0.78%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

2.08%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81%

2.71%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.14%

3.06%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.99%

2.68%

+2.31%

RTHAX vs. TMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTHAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than TMNIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTHAX vs. TMNIX - Dividend Comparison

RTHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than TMNIX's 3.48% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
3.90%3.60%4.02%3.97%3.64%2.80%3.10%3.83%3.86%3.44%4.06%
TMNIX
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund
3.48%2.79%3.31%3.40%0.36%4.39%2.36%3.69%1.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTHAX and TMNIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RTHAX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to TMNIX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTHAX dropped -18.89% vs TMNIX's -4.63%.

RTHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTHAX and TMNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer