RTH vs. MAIN
RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index, while MAIN (Main Street Capital Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, RTH returned 14.35%/yr vs 13.19%/yr for MAIN. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RTH vs. MAIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTH achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly higher than MAIN's -10.97% return. Over the past 10 years, RTH has outperformed MAIN with an annualized return of 14.35%, while MAIN has yielded a comparatively lower 13.19% annualized return.
RTH
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 4.33%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- 1Y
- 12.87%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.35%
MAIN
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- -10.97%
- 6M
- -12.92%
- 1Y
- -3.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.19%
RTH vs. MAIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 4.33% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
MAIN Main Street Capital Corporation | -10.97% | 10.74% | 47.30% | 28.22% | -11.37% | 48.31% | -19.54% | 36.88% | -8.27% | 16.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTH and MAIN is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2007 | 0.35 |
The correlation between RTH and MAIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTH vs. MAIN — Risk / Return Rank
RTH
MAIN
RTH vs. MAIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RTH | MAIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.99 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | -0.18 | +1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | -0.35 | +5.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RTH vs. MAIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTH drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum MAIN drawdown of -64.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTH and MAIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTH | MAIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -64.53% | +22.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.83% | -22.43% | +14.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -22.43% | +8.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.00% | -27.06% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.00% | -64.53% | +39.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -18.28% | +14.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -7.31% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 11.18% | -8.83% |
Volatility
RTH vs. MAIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) is 3.85%, while Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that RTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTH | MAIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 5.82% | -1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.28% | 20.12% | -10.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 24.84% | -12.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 21.57% | -4.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 27.30% | -9.76% |
Dividends
RTH vs. MAIN - Dividend Comparison
RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than MAIN's 8.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAIN Main Street Capital Corporation | 8.25% | 7.00% | 7.02% | 8.55% | 7.97% | 5.74% | 6.99% | 6.76% | 8.43% | 7.49% | 7.42% | 9.15% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.93% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RTH and MAIN have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAIN has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to RTH (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTH dropped -42.32% vs MAIN's -64.53%.
RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RTH and MAIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer