PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTH vs. KLXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTH vs. KLXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RTH

1D
0.35%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
1.87%
6M
1.10%
1Y
7.77%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
13.87%

KLXY

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTH vs. KLXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RTH
VanEck Vectors Retail ETF
1.87%12.36%20.02%8.38%
KLXY
Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF
-0.86%13.69%-6.39%2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RTH and KLXY is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2023

0.49

The correlation between RTH and KLXY shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RTH vs. KLXY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RTH
KLXY

Consumer Cyclical

56.4%
73.2%

Consumer Defensive

27.6%
21.8%

Healthcare

13.5%
4.9%

Industrials

2.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

RTH
56.4%
KLXY
73.2%

Consumer Defensive

RTH
27.6%
KLXY
21.8%

Healthcare

RTH
13.5%
KLXY
4.9%

Industrials

RTH
2.5%
KLXY

-

Basic Materials

RTH

-

KLXY

-

Communication Services

RTH

-

KLXY

-

Energy

RTH

-

KLXY

-

Financial Services

RTH

-

KLXY

-

Real Estate

RTH

-

KLXY

-

Technology

RTH

-

KLXY

-

Utilities

RTH

-

KLXY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTH vs. KLXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTH
RTH Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
RTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTH Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
RTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTH Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

KLXY
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTH vs. KLXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RTHKLXYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.46

RTH vs. KLXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RTHKLXYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

Drawdowns

RTH vs. KLXY - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTHKLXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

Volatility

RTH vs. KLXY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTHKLXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

RTH vs. KLXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KLXY's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTH vs. KLXY - Dividend Comparison

RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than KLXY's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KLXY
Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF
0.85%0.84%0.74%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RTH
VanEck Vectors Retail ETF
0.95%0.97%0.77%1.07%1.16%0.78%0.64%0.91%1.05%1.56%1.84%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTH and KLXY have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KLXY.

RTH has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.85% for KLXY.

RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index, while KLXY tracks Solactive Global Luxury Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RTH and 0.69% for KLXY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTH and KLXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer