PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSVAX vs. SMVTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSVAX vs. SMVTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX) and Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSVAX achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly lower than SMVTX's 22.29% return. Over the past 10 years, RSVAX has underperformed SMVTX with an annualized return of 9.13%, while SMVTX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.19% annualized return.


RSVAX

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
6.34%
6M
6.47%
1Y
13.21%
3Y*
10.73%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
9.13%

SMVTX

1D
0.27%
1M
1.10%
YTD
22.29%
6M
20.78%
1Y
45.23%
3Y*
24.49%
5Y*
11.97%
10Y*
12.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSVAX vs. SMVTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSVAX
Victory RS Value Fund
6.34%4.58%12.58%7.63%-2.98%27.30%-2.60%31.36%-10.84%17.37%
SMVTX
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund
22.29%17.58%18.93%10.94%-13.89%29.15%-1.19%33.14%-8.01%11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between RSVAX and SMVTX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.88

The correlation between RSVAX and SMVTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSVAX vs. SMVTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSVAX
RSVAX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
RSVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
RSVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SMVTX
SMVTX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SMVTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMVTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMVTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SMVTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMVTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSVAX vs. SMVTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX) and Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSVAXSMVTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.51

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

6.31

-4.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.53

23.22

-17.69

RSVAX vs. SMVTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the SMVTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSVAX and SMVTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSVAXSMVTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

2.96

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.59

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.59

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.49

-0.09

Drawdowns

RSVAX vs. SMVTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSVAX drawdown since its inception was -59.23%, which is greater than SMVTX's maximum drawdown of -54.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSVAX and SMVTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSVAXSMVTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.23%

-54.72%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

-7.17%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.98%

-24.75%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.58%

-25.44%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.49%

-45.45%

+1.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

0.00%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.81%

-8.23%

-5.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

1.94%

+0.34%

Volatility

RSVAX vs. SMVTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX) is 3.04%, while Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) has a volatility of 4.99%. This indicates that RSVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMVTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSVAXSMVTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

4.99%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

11.91%

-3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

15.27%

-3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.10%

20.44%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

20.63%

-1.43%

RSVAX vs. SMVTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSVAX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SMVTX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSVAX vs. SMVTX - Dividend Comparison

RSVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.30%, less than SMVTX's 13.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSVAX
Victory RS Value Fund
8.30%8.83%9.89%6.48%6.33%14.14%1.93%7.38%15.47%25.04%12.47%9.35%
SMVTX
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund
13.44%16.44%15.96%1.16%6.75%18.53%2.52%5.82%14.47%20.86%3.61%7.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSVAX and SMVTX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMVTX has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to RSVAX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSVAX dropped -59.23% vs SMVTX's -54.72%.

SMVTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSVAX and SMVTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer