RSVAX vs. FASPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX).
RSVAX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Jun 30, 1993. FASPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 20, 1986.
Performance
RSVAX vs. FASPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSVAX vs. FASPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSVAX Victory RS Value Fund | 1.67% | 4.58% | 12.58% | 7.63% | -2.98% | 27.30% | -2.60% | 31.36% | -10.84% | 17.37% |
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M | 6.23% | 7.76% | -2.60% | 19.93% | -7.82% | 32.65% | 7.70% | 33.85% | -17.27% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSVAX achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly lower than FASPX's 6.23% return. Over the past 10 years, RSVAX has underperformed FASPX with an annualized return of 8.92%, while FASPX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.64% annualized return.
RSVAX
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -6.09%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 3.14%
- 1Y
- 7.80%
- 3Y*
- 8.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
FASPX
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- 6.23%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 23.62%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSVAX vs. FASPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSVAX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FASPX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSVAX vs. FASPX — Risk / Return Rank
RSVAX
FASPX
RSVAX vs. FASPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSVAX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | 1.08 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 1.65 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.22 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 1.61 | -0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.97 | 6.47 | -3.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSVAX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 1.08 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.33 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.44 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSVAX and FASPX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RSVAX vs. FASPX - Dividend Comparison
RSVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.69%, less than FASPX's 8.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSVAX Victory RS Value Fund | 8.69% | 8.83% | 9.89% | 6.48% | 6.33% | 14.14% | 1.93% | 7.38% | 15.47% | 25.04% | 12.47% | 9.35% |
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M | 8.78% | 9.32% | 0.00% | 2.40% | 1.93% | 7.80% | 0.55% | 4.98% | 15.67% | 7.26% | 21.61% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
RSVAX vs. FASPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSVAX drawdown since its inception was -59.23%, smaller than the maximum FASPX drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSVAX and FASPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSVAX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.23% | -70.11% | +10.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.06% | -15.26% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.58% | -34.53% | +10.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.49% | -48.02% | +4.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.16% | -7.29% | +1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -9.87% | -4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 3.79% | -0.87% |
Volatility
RSVAX vs. FASPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX) is 4.16%, while Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that RSVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSVAX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 6.16% | -2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.05% | 12.82% | -3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.29% | 22.61% | -6.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 20.66% | -2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 21.98% | -2.78% |