RSSY vs. BUFH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RSSY (Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSSY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSSY charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.

Performance

RSSY vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSY achieves a 29.90% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.49% return.

RSSY

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -0.68%
• YTD: 29.90%
• 6M: 28.17%
• 1Y: 39.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFH

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 2.49%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSSY vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF	29.90%	6.89%
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	2.49%	3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RSSY and BUFH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

RSSY vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSSY

RSSY Risk / Return Rank: 90
RSSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
RSSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
RSSY Omega Ratio Rank: 89
RSSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
RSSY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

BUFH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSY vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSSY	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.96	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.95	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.40	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.16	—	—

Drawdowns

RSSY vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSY drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSY and BUFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSSY	BUFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.57%	-1.53%	-28.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.56%	-0.07%	-2.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.21%	-0.18%	-7.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RSSY	BUFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.46%	2.38%	+11.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.24%	2.38%	+15.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.24%	2.38%	+15.86%

RSSY vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSSY vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

RSSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF	1.57%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSSY and BUFH in my portfolio?

RSSY and BUFH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RSSY or BUFH?

On fees, BUFH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSSY or BUFH?

BUFH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSSY or BUFH?

RSSY has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

What is the main difference between RSSY and BUFH?

RSSY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for RSSY and 0.95% for BUFH.