RSSS vs. KGC
RSSS (Research Solutions, Inc.) and KGC (Kinross Gold Corporation) are both stocks. RSSS operates in Software - Application (Technology), while KGC operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, RSSS returned 6.30%/yr vs 20.27%/yr for KGC. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
RSSS vs. KGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSSS achieves a -24.83% return, which is significantly lower than KGC's 0.30% return. Over the past 10 years, RSSS has underperformed KGC with an annualized return of 6.30%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively higher 20.27% annualized return.
RSSS
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -16.60%
- YTD
- -24.83%
- 6M
- -25.08%
- 1Y
- -20.50%
- 3Y*
- 1.72%
- 5Y*
- -1.88%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
KGC
- 1D
- -2.83%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- 82.52%
- 3Y*
- 82.00%
- 5Y*
- 31.03%
- 10Y*
- 20.27%
RSSS vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSSS Research Solutions, Inc. | -24.83% | -29.16% | 59.62% | 35.42% | -21.95% | 5.58% | -35.28% | 46.94% | 100.82% | 18.45% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.30% | 206.11% | 55.63% | 51.83% | -27.59% | -19.00% | 56.04% | 46.30% | -25.00% | 38.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSSS and KGC is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2013 | -0.01 |
Fundamentals
RSSS:
$69.88M
KGC:
$33.92B
RSSS:
$0.14
KGC:
$2.35
RSSS:
15.51
KGC:
11.97
RSSS:
0.13
KGC:
0.16
RSSS:
1.44
KGC:
4.31
RSSS:
3.67
KGC:
3.72
RSSS:
$48.66M
KGC:
$7.94B
RSSS:
$24.69M
KGC:
$4.19B
RSSS:
$5.11M
KGC:
$5.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSSS vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank
RSSS
KGC
RSSS vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Research Solutions, Inc. (RSSS) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSSS | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.29 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 2.75 | -3.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 7.23 | -8.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSSS | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 1.66 | -2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.71 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.43 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.08 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
RSSS vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSSS drawdown since its inception was -79.23%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSS and KGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSSS | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.23% | -96.00% | +16.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.46% | -30.20% | -16.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.92% | -30.20% | -18.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.92% | -60.46% | +11.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.67% | -67.75% | +16.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.75% | -25.81% | -20.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.32% | -57.63% | +21.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.79% | 11.45% | +15.34% |
Volatility
RSSS vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison
Research Solutions, Inc. (RSSS) has a higher volatility of 22.28% compared to Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) at 15.68%. This indicates that RSSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSSS | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.28% | 15.68% | +6.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.02% | 38.88% | -5.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.18% | 49.99% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.31% | 43.92% | +1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.32% | 46.90% | +4.42% |
Dividends
RSSS vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison
RSSS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.51% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% |
RSSS Research Solutions, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RSSS vs. KGC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Research Solutions, Inc. and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RSSS vs. KGC - Profitability Comparison
RSSS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Research Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.27M and revenue of 12.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.7%.
KGC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.37B and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.8%.
RSSS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Research Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.04M and revenue of 12.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.
KGC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.
RSSS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Research Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 860.21K and revenue of 12.12M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
KGC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 831.32M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RSSS and KGC have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSSS has higher volatility (22.28%) compared to KGC (15.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSS dropped -79.23% vs KGC's -96.00%.
KGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSSS and KGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer