RSSB vs. TFPN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN).

RSSB and TFPN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSSB is an actively managed fund by Return Stacked. It was launched on Dec 4, 2023. TFPN is an actively managed fund by Tidal ETFs. It was launched on Jul 11, 2023.

Performance

RSSB vs. TFPN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RSSB vs. TFPN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	-3.24%	25.16%	10.53%	6.73%
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF	8.26%	3.61%	2.67%	0.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSB achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than TFPN's 8.26% return.

RSSB

• 1D: 2.80%
• 1M: -8.72%
• YTD: -3.24%
• 6M: -0.12%
• 1Y: 20.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TFPN

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -5.66%
• YTD: 8.26%
• 6M: 12.04%
• 1Y: 23.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSSB vs. TFPN - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSB has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than TFPN's 1.10% expense ratio.

TFPN

Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF

RSSB

Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF

Return for Risk

RSSB vs. TFPN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSSB

RSSB Risk / Return Rank: 66
RSSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
RSSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
RSSB Omega Ratio Rank: 62
RSSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
RSSB Martin Ratio Rank: 70

TFPN

TFPN Risk / Return Rank: 86
TFPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
TFPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
TFPN Omega Ratio Rank: 83
TFPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
TFPN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSB vs. TFPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSSB	TFPN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	1.78	-0.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	2.46	-0.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.33	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	3.06	-1.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.67	9.20	-2.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSSB vs. TFPN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the TFPN Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSB and TFPN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSSB	TFPN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	1.78	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	0.38	+0.63

Correlation

The correlation between RSSB and TFPN is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RSSB vs. TFPN - Dividend Comparison

RSSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, while TFPN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	3.60%	3.48%	1.10%	0.61%
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.94%	0.98%

Drawdowns

RSSB vs. TFPN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSB drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, roughly equal to the maximum TFPN drawdown of -16.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSB and TFPN.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSSB	TFPN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.21%	-16.72%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.52%	-7.47%	-5.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.81%	-6.21%	-2.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-5.13%	+2.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	2.49%	+0.62%

Volatility

RSSB vs. TFPN - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) has a higher volatility of 7.57% compared to Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) at 5.30%. This indicates that RSSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSSB	TFPN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.57%	5.30%	+2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.90%	11.21%	+0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.15%	13.40%	+5.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.57%	12.38%	+4.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.57%	12.38%	+4.19%