PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSSB vs. RSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSSB vs. RSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSB achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than RSSX's -7.34% return.


RSSB

1D
0.02%
1M
-1.13%
6M
4.80%
YTD
7.52%
1Y
19.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.99%

RSSX

1D
-1.17%
1M
-0.41%
6M
-14.50%
YTD
-7.34%
1Y
11.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.36M$1.99M$1.95M
$272.27K$297.63K$434.90K

RSSB vs. RSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSSB and RSSX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025

0.67

The correlation between RSSB and RSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSSB vs. RSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSSB
RSSB Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSB Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

RSSX
RSSX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
RSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSSB vs. RSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSSBRSSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.08

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

0.40

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.54

0.84

+5.69

RSSB vs. RSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the RSSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSB and RSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSSB vs. RSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSB drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, smaller than the maximum RSSX drawdown of -27.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSB and RSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSSBRSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.21%

-27.37%

+11.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-27.37%

+15.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-22.61%

+19.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-8.75%

+6.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

12.88%

-9.87%

Volatility

RSSB vs. RSSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) is 4.43%, while Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) has a volatility of 9.12%. This indicates that RSSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSSBRSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

9.12%

-4.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.38%

29.33%

-15.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

34.78%

-18.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

32.78%

-16.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.73%

32.78%

-16.05%

RSSB vs. RSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than RSSX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSSB vs. RSSX - Dividend Comparison

RSSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than RSSX's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
RSSB
Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF
3.24%3.48%1.10%0.61%
RSSX
Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF
1.67%1.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSSB and RSSX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSSX has higher volatility (9.12%) compared to RSSB (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSB dropped -16.21% vs RSSX's -27.37%.

On 1-year performance, RSSB leads with 19.46% vs 11.86% for RSSX. On fees, RSSB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RSSB has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSSB has performed better with a 19.46% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSSB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for RSSX.

RSSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 1.67% for RSSX.

RSSB is categorized as Global Allocation, while RSSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RSSB and 0.68% for RSSX.

RSSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSSB and RSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer