RSSB vs. PLSDX
RSSB (Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF) and PLSDX (Pacific Funds Short Duration Income) are both funds - RSSB is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while PLSDX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Pacific Funds Series Trust. Over the past year, RSSB returned 27.89% vs 4.32% for PLSDX. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSSB charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PLSDX.
Performance
RSSB vs. PLSDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSSB achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than PLSDX's 0.79% return.
RSSB
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 27.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLSDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 3.11%
- 10Y*
- 2.99%
RSSB vs. PLSDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF | 9.57% | 25.16% | 10.53% | 6.73% |
PLSDX Pacific Funds Short Duration Income | 0.79% | 5.93% | 5.44% | 1.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSSB and PLSDX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSSB vs. PLSDX — Risk / Return Rank
RSSB
PLSDX
RSSB vs. PLSDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and Pacific Funds Short Duration Income (PLSDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSSB | PLSDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.76 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 4.46 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.86 | 20.98 | -11.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSSB | PLSDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 3.10 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 1.84 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
RSSB vs. PLSDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSSB drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, which is greater than PLSDX's maximum drawdown of -7.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSB and PLSDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSSB | PLSDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -7.79% | -8.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -0.97% | -10.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -7.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | 0.00% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.26% | -0.50% | -1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 0.21% | +2.63% |
Volatility
RSSB vs. PLSDX - Volatility Comparison
Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Pacific Funds Short Duration Income (PLSDX) at 0.46%. This indicates that RSSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLSDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSSB | PLSDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 0.46% | +4.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 1.06% | +11.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 1.40% | +13.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 1.82% | +14.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 1.77% | +14.82% |
RSSB vs. PLSDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSSB has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than PLSDX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSSB vs. PLSDX - Dividend Comparison
RSSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than PLSDX's 4.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLSDX Pacific Funds Short Duration Income | 4.46% | 4.57% | 5.00% | 4.01% | 2.20% | 2.38% | 1.93% | 2.66% | 2.63% | 2.20% | 1.90% | 2.08% |
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF | 3.18% | 3.48% | 1.10% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSSB and PLSDX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSSB has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to PLSDX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSB dropped -16.21% vs PLSDX's -7.79%.
PLSDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSSB and PLSDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer