RSSB vs. MAPP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSSB (Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF) and MAPP (Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSSB returned 27.89% vs 21.23% for MAPP. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSSB charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for MAPP.

Performance

RSSB vs. MAPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSB achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than MAPP's 7.25% return.

RSSB

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 9.57%
• 6M: 9.59%
• 1Y: 27.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAPP

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 2.82%
• YTD: 7.25%
• 6M: 8.20%
• 1Y: 21.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSSB vs. MAPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	9.57%	25.16%	10.53%	6.73%
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF	7.25%	18.67%	14.25%	3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between RSSB and MAPP is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023	0.89

The correlation between RSSB and MAPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSSB vs. MAPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSSB	MAPP
Technology	27.9%	36.9%
Financial Services	15.9%	15.0%
Industrials	11.5%	8.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	8.3%
Communication Services	8.3%	12.2%
Healthcare	8.2%	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	5.4%
Energy	4.3%	2.3%
Basic Materials	4.1%	2.9%
Utilities	2.7%	1.8%
Real Estate	2.4%	1.6%

Return for Risk

RSSB vs. MAPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSSB

RSSB Risk / Return Rank: 52
RSSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
RSSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
RSSB Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RSSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
RSSB Martin Ratio Rank: 56

MAPP

MAPP Risk / Return Rank: 73
MAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
MAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
MAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 73
MAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
MAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSB vs. MAPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSSB	MAPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	2.39	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	3.37	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.43	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	3.45	-1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.86	13.70	-3.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSSB vs. MAPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the MAPP Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSB and MAPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSSB	MAPP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	2.39	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.29	1.53	-0.24

Drawdowns

RSSB vs. MAPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSB drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, which is greater than MAPP's maximum drawdown of -12.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSB and MAPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSSB	MAPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.21%	-12.92%	-3.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.63%	-6.17%	-5.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.22%	-0.65%	-0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.26%	-1.38%	-0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	1.55%	+1.29%

Volatility

RSSB vs. MAPP - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) at 2.98%. This indicates that RSSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSSB	MAPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	2.98%	+1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.64%	7.07%	+5.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.26%	8.94%	+6.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.59%	10.75%	+5.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.59%	10.75%	+5.84%

RSSB vs. MAPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSB has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than MAPP's 0.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSSB vs. MAPP - Dividend Comparison

RSSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than MAPP's 2.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF	2.76%	2.96%	2.41%	2.78%
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	3.18%	3.48%	1.10%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSSB and MAPP in my portfolio?

RSSB and MAPP have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSSB or MAPP?

RSSB has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to MAPP (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSB dropped -16.21% vs MAPP's -12.92%.

Which ETF is better, RSSB or MAPP?

On 1-year performance, RSSB leads with 27.89% vs 21.23% for MAPP. On fees, RSSB is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, MAPP has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSSB or MAPP?

Over the 1-year period, RSSB has performed better with a 27.89% return vs 21.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSSB or MAPP?

RSSB is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.92% for MAPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSSB or MAPP?

RSSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 2.76% for MAPP.

What is the main difference between RSSB and MAPP?

They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for RSSB and 0.92% for MAPP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.