RSSB vs. LALT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RSSB (Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF) and LALT (First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSSB returned 24.25% vs 18.12% for LALT. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSSB charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for LALT.

Performance

RSSB vs. LALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RSSB having a 7.65% return and LALT slightly higher at 7.92%.

RSSB

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: 7.65%
• 6M: 6.97%
• 1Y: 24.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LALT

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -2.82%
• YTD: 7.92%
• 6M: 7.36%
• 1Y: 18.12%
• 3Y*: 9.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSSB vs. LALT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	7.65%	25.16%	10.53%	6.63%
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF	7.92%	10.79%	8.77%	0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between RSSB and LALT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2023	0.36

The correlation between RSSB and LALT shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RSSB vs. LALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSSB

RSSB Risk / Return Rank: 45
RSSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
RSSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RSSB Omega Ratio Rank: 43
RSSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
RSSB Martin Ratio Rank: 51

LALT

LALT Risk / Return Rank: 88
LALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
LALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
LALT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
LALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
LALT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSB vs. LALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSSB	LALT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	2.58	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	3.56	-1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.49	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	5.53	-3.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.41	20.49	-12.08

RSSB vs. LALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the LALT Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSB and LALT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSSB vs. LALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSB drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, which is greater than LALT's maximum drawdown of -6.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSB and LALT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSSB	LALT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.21%	-6.97%	-9.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.63%	-3.29%	-8.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.95%	-3.29%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.26%	-1.00%	-1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	0.89%	+2.00%

Volatility

RSSB vs. LALT - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) at 2.07%. This indicates that RSSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSSB	LALT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.42%	2.07%	+4.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.71%	5.68%	+8.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.19%	7.08%	+9.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.83%	5.83%	+11.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.83%	5.83%	+11.00%

RSSB vs. LALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than LALT's 1.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSSB vs. LALT - Dividend Comparison

RSSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than LALT's 3.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF	3.78%	2.03%	2.06%	2.44%
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	3.23%	3.48%	1.10%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSSB and LALT in my portfolio?

RSSB and LALT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSSB or LALT?

RSSB has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to LALT (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSB dropped -16.21% vs LALT's -6.97%.

Which ETF is better, RSSB or LALT?

On 1-year performance, RSSB leads with 24.25% vs 18.12% for LALT. On fees, RSSB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, LALT has been the lower-risk option at 2.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSSB or LALT?

Over the 1-year period, RSSB has performed better with a 24.25% return vs 18.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSSB or LALT?

RSSB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for LALT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSSB or LALT?

LALT has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 3.23% for RSSB.

What is the main difference between RSSB and LALT?

They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RSSB and 1.94% for LALT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.